Orange County NC Website
22 <br /> 1 pre-K students, then it should amend the ordinance. He read the following from page 19 of the <br /> 2 abstract item: Certificate of Adequacy of Public School Facilities <br /> 3 <br /> 4 a.) Subject to the remaining provisions of this [article], no approval under this <br /> 5 ordinance of a subdivision preliminary plat, minor subdivision final plat, site plan, <br /> 6 or conditional or special use permit for residential development shall become <br /> 7 effective unless and until a Certificate of Adequacy of Public Schools Facilities <br /> 8 (CAPS) for the project has been issued by the School District. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Commissioner McKee said it his understanding that universal pre-K would be open to <br /> 11 any child in Orange County,just like K-12. <br /> 12 Commissioner Marcoplos said he agreed, and drawing a line based on means seems to go <br /> 13 against the spirit of public education. <br /> 14 Commissioner Price said there are different funding streams for various pre-K programs. <br /> 15 She said there are some slots for people who have means to pay, and there are other slots for <br /> 16 those with lesser income, or those children with specific needs. She said Durham uses a sliding <br /> 17 scale. She said many families who can pay for private pre-K do so, and thus do not use the <br /> 18 public pre-K. <br /> 19 Commissioner Dorosin said if the BOCC adds pre-K to the numbers, given the issues <br /> 20 raised by Travis Myren in the presentation, the BOCC could raise the percentage capacity in the <br /> 21 statute for elementary schools. <br /> 22 Chair Rich asked if this would buy the County many years. <br /> 23 Travis Myren said the 267 pre-K students are 5% of total capacity, and they would need <br /> 24 to add the 5%to the total capacity, which is certainly an option to explore. He referred back to <br /> 25 the recommendations, and whether the BOCC wants to pursue an amendment or create a <br /> 26 different tracking tool. <br /> 27 Commissioner Greene asked if there is a suggested amendment for the BOCC to <br /> 28 consider, and would it incorporate pre-K and make it mandatory. She said she thought the desire <br /> 29 was to avoid that. <br /> 30 John Roberts said that is correct. He said if pre-K numbers are included, he would <br /> 31 recommend that the Board amend the ordinance so that CAPS no longer determines if a <br /> 32 developer can build. He said the ordinance can remain as a planning tool. <br /> 33 Commissioner McKee asked if the Board is talking about pre-K at the mandated level, <br /> 34 the existing level, the waiting list level, or the universal level. He said he is confused. <br /> 35 Chair Rich said the agenda item is not addressing whether or not the BOCC wants to <br /> 36 create universal pre-K. She said this item is addressing the issue, which the schools brought to <br /> 37 the BOCC, that pre-K students have never been included, and it is a flaw in SAPFO. She said <br /> 38 the unfunded K-3 mandate from the State will require more classrooms, and if pre-K students are <br /> 39 filling up the classrooms that are needed to meet the K-3 mandates, what will be done with the <br /> 40 pre-K students. She said the question is whether to include the pre-K students in the SAPFO <br /> 41 numbers. <br /> 42 Commissioner McKee from his perspective the existing pre-K numbers should be <br /> 43 included now. <br /> 44 Chair Rich said universal pre-K does not have to all be housed in public schools. <br />