Orange County NC Website
22 <br /> Chair Rich said this entire conversation started when the General Assembly placed <br /> unfunded mandates on the classroom size for grades K-3. She said these are tough questions, <br /> and there is a constant attack on public education. She said the needs are constant. <br /> CHCCS Chair Wolf said she is in favor of counting existing students, and if there are <br /> operating funds for new classrooms, that would be wonderful. She said having accurate <br /> numbers will better inform capacity discussions moving forward. <br /> Chair Rich asked if counting existing students will affect the waiting lists. <br /> OCS Chair Atherton said it does not address the waiting lists, and the waiting list should <br /> remain a separate issue. He said the only way to address the waiting list is with funding, and <br /> that will be seen in the schools' budget requests. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said if existing pre-K students are not counted, the County will <br /> never know the implications. <br /> OCS Chair Atherton said in OCS, SAPFO can be updated with an amendment. He said <br /> if the goal is to approve the counting of current students, the Board of County Commissioners <br /> would approve the proposal, then Hillsborough, and then OCS and then the same process for <br /> CHCCS. He said after all have approved and signed, it would be in effect. <br /> Commissioner Bedford said that could take a long time, and possibly not pass. She <br /> said another option would be to present the numbers as they are now, and share the <br /> information in a format as if the capacities were different, including those in pre-K, so that all <br /> know the projections. <br /> Commissioner Bedford said the CAPS would stay the same, under the law, and legal <br /> dollars are not at risk when a first CAP is denied. She said if numbers are presented with the <br /> new capacities for the building on another page, then the BOCC will have the numbers. She <br /> said this could be done simultaneously. She said she could anticipate some strong push back, <br /> as SAPFO was not easy to get done in the first place. <br /> OCS Chair Atherton said both schools have consulted their attorneys, and The Town of <br /> Hillsborough is open for discussion. He said he does not anticipate large pushback. <br /> Chair Rich said this item needs to go on the Board of County Commissioners' agenda <br /> first, with full information, projection numbers, and discussion. <br /> OCS Chair Atherton said the BOCC has been given these numbers and reviewed them <br /> in the recent work session. He said there is no way to expand the pre-K program, as there are <br /> no funds. He said the numbers that were shared are the only numbers there are. <br /> Chair Rich said this should be added to the next agenda review. <br /> Rani Dasi asked if Commissioner Bedford could clarify where she expects there to be <br /> pushback. <br /> Commissioner Bedford said there was a county near Charlotte that was challenged, and <br /> it was found illegal. She said it was very similar case. She said several years ago in Orange <br /> County, a request was brought forward to abolish SAPFO, but it was kept due to its value as a <br /> planning tool. She said in the 1990s, some of the schools were incredibly overcrowded, and <br /> SAPFO was created to address that problem. She said the desire was to stay under the radar. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said someone was denied permission to build a school. <br /> Commissioner Bedford said yes, and that is what will happen if capacity is increased, <br /> but there are no funds to build a school, and the school district will deny CAPS. She said then <br /> the County will have to provide the legal dollars to defend that case. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said there is no legal obligation to deny CAPS, and SAPFO is a <br /> planning tool. <br /> Commissioner Bedford said the tool actually says the school boards must issue CAPS. <br /> She said when Northside ES was built, the CHCCS school board could have denied CAPS <br /> during that year, but since the funding was in force, and going to be coming, there was a <br /> gentleman's agreement to not do that, but legally it could have been done. <br />