Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-20; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Agenda - 05-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 05-05-20; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2020 1:51:21 PM
Creation date
4/30/2020 2:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 05-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 05-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Minutes 05-05-2020 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> <br />BACKGROUND: As part of the FY 2019-20 budget, the Board of Commissioners authorized an 1 <br />additional ¼ cent property tax to provide an estimated $469,272 dedicated to accelerating 2 <br />climate change mitigation through the new Climate Change Mitigation Project in the Capital 3 <br />Investment Plan. 4 <br /> 5 <br />When the tax was authorized, the BOCC stated that it would decide the final prioritization of 6 <br />projects to be funded, and the Board requested that the Commission for the Environment (CFE) 7 <br />provide feedback on prospective projects in advance of BOCC review. 8 <br /> 9 <br />The CFE completed its initial scoring, and the BOCC reviewed a report that outlined the 10 <br />recommended projects at its Business meeting on February 4th. At that meeting the Board 11 <br />approved funding for two of the four recommended projects, and at the request of school 12 <br />leadership, temporarily deferred taking any action on the two projects which make up the 13 <br />proposed Solar for Schools grant program. Attachment 1 is a copy of this report revised in 14 <br />accordance with the comments received from the BOCC. 15 <br /> 16 <br />During the discussion of the Solar for Schools grant program, Board members asked several 17 <br />questions in preparation for additional discussion in the future. In response, staff revised the 18 <br />report and had discussions with staff in both school districts. Attachment 2 is a list of the Board 19 <br />members’ questions and follow-up responses on the recommended Solar for Schools Grant 20 <br />Program. 21 <br /> 22 <br />The Board considered the item again at its April 7, 2020 Business meeting. However, some 23 <br />additional concerns were raised by both school systems. The Board once again deferred action 24 <br />on the two proposed Solar for Schools projects to allow additional communication between both 25 <br />school districts and County staff, and also to allow both Boards of Education to consider the 26 <br />proposed rooftop solar projects. 27 <br /> 28 <br />The Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) Board of Education met on April 16, 2020 and 29 <br />expressed support for its rooftop solar project. The Orange County Schools (OCS) Board of 30 <br />Education is scheduled to meet on April 20, 2020 to discuss its rooftop solar project, and County 31 <br />staff will provide an update to the BOCC on any actions taken at that OCS meeting. 32 <br /> 33 <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Climate Action Tax is projected to generate $469,272 in funds in FY 34 <br />2019-20. The top two recommended projects have already been approved to use $169,272 of 35 <br />these funds, and the remaining $300,000 is recommended to fund two Solar for Schools grants 36 <br />for $150,000 each. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Chair Rich said both school districts have indicated that they would like to move forward 39 <br />on these solar projects. 40 <br />Travis Myren reminded the Board that they discussed this item on April 7th and additional 41 <br />questions were raised, and staff was asked to see if the school districts would like to use these 42 <br />funds. 43 <br />Travis Myren said both Boards of Education (BOE’s) accepted these grant funds, and he 44 <br />circulated both action items from both districts to the Orange County Board of Commissioners 45 <br />earlier today. 46 <br />Commissioner McKee said he had concerns about the differences between leasing and 47 <br />purchasing. He said there may be a lower up front cost with leasing, but if they actually use the 48 <br />funds to leverage a larger system, it may be cheaper over the long term to own. He asked if 49 <br />staff has any figures on long-term costs. He said there were some answers in the abstract, but 50
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.