Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-19-2001-5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 06-19-2001
>
Agenda - 06-19-2001-5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:24:25 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/19/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 06-19-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
NA RES-2001-069 Resolution Endorsing the Regional Transportation Strategy for the RTP Region of NC
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 6 <br />roads are welcomed and exist on the plans of other communities. Wake County, for instance, <br />has subregional plans that cite 'new arterials/surface streets as desirable, if funding is <br />available. According to Mayor Lang, Cary will soon decide to spend many, many millions <br />over the next decade to build and improve arterial roads. Durham also is interested in new <br />arterials and collectors, though to a lesser degree than Wake, and Durham does not have <br />Cary's resources. This plan's figures reflect no new money and no new alignments for <br />arterials and collectors in Orange County. <br />To sum up, a decision to build arterials and collectors is obviously a decision made by local <br />government. This plan reflects and respects the particular and differing positions of the local <br />governments within our region. <br />Current Activities <br />The mayors' group continues to meet at least once a month to plan speaking engagements, <br />confer on the status of transportation discussions in the General Assembly, and strategize <br />about haw we can get the public interested, informed and active on this topic. To date we <br />have presented to and received the endorsement of the following official bodies: <br />DCHC MOP (March 14) <br />CAMPO (March Z 1) <br />Wake County Board of Commissioners (April 2) <br />Raleigh City Council (April 17) <br />Cary Town Council (Apri126) <br />As you recall, Mayor Lang made a presentation to the Orange County Assembly of <br />Governments on April 19. T'rn in the process of seeking local endorsements here at home, <br />Presentations already made to non-elected groups include: <br />Triangle Legislative Delegation (Apri12D) <br />Wake Legislative Delegation (May 7) <br />Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce (March 1 S) <br />Greater Raleigh Chamber of Commerce (May 9) <br />Triangle Community Coalition (May 9) <br />Women in Transportation Seminar (May 15) <br />We also have the following presentations scheduled: <br />Durham City Council (May 17) <br />Durham County Board of Commissioners (not sure of date, sometime in May) <br />NC legislators in Washington, DC (May 23) <br />Jammin' in the Park (celebration of RTP's travel demand management program, June 1) <br />NC Board of Transportation (June 6) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.