Orange County NC Website
Orange Caurzty <br />Needs Assessment Project <br />ACCOUNTING: <br />Page 10 <br />Issue 1: The current general ledger system is unable to maintain a hierarchical chart of <br />accounts. This would allow for the accurate grouping of similar revenue and cost <br />categories by utilizing aparent /child account relationship. Reporting would be <br />enhanced to allow for high-level or detailed analysis. <br />Issue 2: The completion of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) is <br />currently a manual process. This requires massive manual processing and greatly <br />increases the probability of inaccuracy within the report. <br />Issue 3: The Finance department receives numerous requests for information from other <br />departments within the County., Responses to these requests are often delayed and, <br />depending on the timing of the request, can tie up crucial resources ,during monthly <br />processing. <br />Issue 4: Tax levy information, for billing purposes, is manually entered into, the financial <br />system. This is critical information far County residents 'and the recording of this <br />information should be automated. A system with advanced importing capabilities would <br />allow the information to be electronically updated. <br />ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: <br />Issue 1: The interface between the Department of Housing and Community <br />Development system and the Accounts Payable system results in the processing of 450 to <br />500 rental assistance checks per month. The recording of all voided checks and other <br />adjustments to these checks must, be performed manually. A general ledger with updated <br />edit functionality would simplify what is currently alabor-intensive process. <br />Issue 2: The information that is 'entered onto a purchase order needs to be re-.entered into <br />the Accounts Payable system. This redundancy of manual entry results in errors that <br />cause delayed vendor payments.. <br />Issue 3: Multiple numbers are assigned to some vendors due to differences in the <br />naming convention used by the employee entering the information. The current system <br />does not have the capability to, display a list of all vendors with similar names, nor the <br />ability to maintain alternate names for a vendor. <br />Issue 4: Vendor addresses are routinely changed in the Vendor Master file, causing the <br />file to reflect an incorrect "Remit to" or "Ship to" address. In an integrated system, both <br />Accounts Payable and Purchasing would have access to the Vendor file but only to the <br />appropriate address field. <br />