Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-07-20; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 04-07-20 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 04-07-20; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 9:49:24 AM
Creation date
4/3/2020 8:54:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/7/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 04-07-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2020\Agenda - 04-07-20 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br /> 1 the last piece of the puzzle before the Town can start letting the reservoir fill to its new level, <br /> 2 which is contour 642.2, according to the new survey datum of NAVD 88. <br /> 3 Marie Strandwitz referred to the question about fishing and hunting, and said as part of <br /> 4 the state mitigation, the Town is to put the area around the reservoir in a conservation <br /> 5 easement. She said she has seen documents that state the Town has bought all the necessary <br /> 6 property to encompass the phase 2 level, as well as the State buffer. She said the Town did <br /> 7 not go further into the County setbacks, as it held public hearings at that time. She said the <br /> 8 Town is working with the State to put its properties into a restrictive deed, which are areas well <br /> 9 outside the buffer that the State wants the Town to maintain. She said the restrictive deed <br /> 10 includes no trespassing, no swimming, hunting, fishing, and camping. She said the Town is <br /> 11 required to post signage to this effect. <br /> 12 Marie Strandwitz said the Town has not sent any letters of commendation. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> 15 Amber Broadwell said she has lived in the area for some time, and has fished the entire <br /> 16 time, and she wants to know why fishing is not allowed. <br /> 17 Marie Strandwitz said the State will not allow these types of activities, per the permit that <br /> 18 was obtained in the 1990s. She said it requires the Town to keep protection of its water supply, <br /> 19 which is why the County is having extra setbacks. She said it is a watershed protection area, <br /> 20 and is the water supply for the Town. She said people may have been fishing for years, but <br /> 21 should not have been doing so. <br /> 22 Calvin Parrish asked if it is known who would be financially responsible, if a septic tank <br /> 23 needs replacing. <br /> 24 Michael Harvey said he feels inadequate to answer the question, but if the septic system <br /> 25 fails, there is no provision in the UDO mandating the Town to pay for this. <br /> 26 Commissioner Price asked if the expansion is expected to affect septic tanks. <br /> 27 Michael Harvey said he does not have data to definitively answer that question, but the <br /> 28 setbacks are in place to avoid such issues. He said such issues would have to be addressed <br /> 29 as they arise. <br /> 30 Commissioner McKee asked if staff knows if any of these septic fields will be <br /> 31 submerged by the new water level. <br /> 32 Michael Harvey said no, based on the information he has, there should be no <br /> 33 submerging of septic fields. <br /> 34 James Kennedy said this amendment will devalue the properties. He said any <br /> 35 restriction to a property will scare off buyers. <br /> 36 Chair Rich said currently these properties are following the UDO. <br /> 37 Michael Harvey said the restriction has existed since 1997, and staff is not adding a <br /> 38 restriction but rather clarifying what constitutes an existing lot and existing development for the <br /> 39 purposes of permitting. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 A motion was made by Commissioner Bedford, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br /> 42 close the public hearing. (Note that, because this is a legislative decision, additional comments <br /> 43 at a later date are permitted). <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Michael Harvey said since this is not quasi-judicial process, he said there can be <br /> 46 additional comments made after the hearing is closed. <br /> 47 Commissioner McKee said he was around when this reservoir was planned and built, <br /> 48 and it was contentious to the point that there were threats of vigilante action. He said perhaps <br /> 49 the Town should have put easements up to the setbacks, but that is irrelevant at this point. He <br /> 50 said he wants to make sure that residents are not adversely affected. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.