Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-07-20; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 04-07-20 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 04-07-20; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 9:49:24 AM
Creation date
4/3/2020 8:54:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/7/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 04-07-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2020\Agenda - 04-07-20 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br /> 1 Commissioner McKee referred to a lot that is completely encompassed by the two <br /> 2 setbacks, and asked, if the septic failed, would the property owner be able to fix the problem. <br /> 3 Michael Harvey said County staff would help find a way to replace the septic on the <br /> 4 property because it qualifies as an existing lot. <br /> 5 Commissioner McKee said even if that new septic field was within 150-foot boundary. <br /> 6 Michael Harvey said yes, because that is why there is the definition of existing lot and <br /> 7 existing development. He said staff has to grant as much leeway as humanly possible, as <br /> 8 stipulated by the ordinance. He read the ordinance. <br /> 9 Commissioner McKee clarified that this answer would address the resident who spoke <br /> 10 of his 300 square foot tiny house. <br /> 11 Michael Harvey said Mr. Bush was allowed to take advantage of existing development, <br /> 12 when he built his house in 2013. He said he personally processed this request. He said Mr. <br /> 13 Bush was allowed to place a house where a mobile home had previously been, because it <br /> 14 constituted existing development. He said the septic system was approved with the issuance of <br /> 15 a permit by the Health Department in 1987, and also qualifies as an existing development. He <br /> 16 said part of the problem Mr. Bush is experiencing is the fact that some of his property has been <br /> 17 subdivided and sold to neighbors, which has reduced the overall lot area from 30-acres (in <br /> 18 1979) to a 7-acre parcel currently, with the last recording of an exempt subdivision plat in 2018. <br /> 19 Commissioner Greene asked if these lots are now considered non-conforming. <br /> 20 Michael Harvey said no. He said if a property meets the definition of an existing lot, or <br /> 21 existing development, it is not non-conforming, but rather these properties are subject to the <br /> 22 rules and standards within those two sub-sections, but staff does not declare the lot of as non- <br /> 23 conforming. He said it was created in compliance with the legal standards that existed at the <br /> 24 time, and at the time before the reservoir boundary was set, it meant all applicable criteria. He <br /> 25 said the establishment of the reservoir boundary, in the late 1990s, does not make the lot non- <br /> 26 conforming, but it is governed by existing development/existing lot under section 4.2. <br /> 27 Commissioner Greene said it sounds like the reservoir in non-conforming. <br /> 28 Michael Harvey said the reservoir is not non-conforming. He said the reservoir is the <br /> 29 reservoir, and its boundary was established with the recordation of plats in 1997 to create the <br /> 30 boundary. <br /> 31 Commissioner Greene asked if the subdivision predates the reservoir. <br /> 32 Michael Harvey said yes, the subdivision was in process before the final boundary of the <br /> 33 reservoir was established. <br /> 34 Commissioner Greene said that was unwise. <br /> 35 Michael Harvey said he is at a loss as to why the staff did not amend the ordinance in <br /> 36 1997. <br /> 37 Commissioner Price asked if Mr. Bush were to sell his property, would the new owner be <br /> 38 able to build a bigger home on that same property. <br /> 39 Michael Harvey said potentially, but he would need to see a site plan first, which would <br /> 40 have to demonstrate that it met existing development, or that it is outside of the 150-foot buffer <br /> 41 for setback structures. He said the bigger issue is the lack of perkable soil on the property, <br /> 42 which may not be able to support a larger house. <br /> 43 Commissioner Price said she meant an expansion of the existing footprint. <br /> 44 Michael Harvey said yes, there is opportunity for an expansion of the existing residence. <br /> 45 Commissioner Price clarified that nothing has been issued about condemnation. <br /> 46 Michael Harvey said that is correct, and he has not authored or authorized any letters <br /> 47 stating condemnation of any property as a result of this action. He said this reaction is the <br /> 48 result of one community member seeking to stir up emotions, and while this is an emotional <br /> 49 issue for some, he does not believe the insinuations in the resident's letter have any merit. <br /> 50 Commissioner Price asked if Michael Harvey has seen a letter from a resident. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.