Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-07-20; 6-a - Climate Action Tax Recommendations for FY 2019-20 – School Solar Update
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 04-07-20 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 04-07-20; 6-a - Climate Action Tax Recommendations for FY 2019-20 – School Solar Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 9:48:09 AM
Creation date
4/3/2020 8:50:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/7/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 04-07-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2020\Agenda - 04-07-20 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> Solar panels have a 25 year life expectancy, and the leasing company often only owns the panels for the <br /> first 5-10 years.The schools have the option to write into the lease agreement that the solar company <br /> will manage any repairs and maintenance either during the time the system is owned by the solar <br /> company or for the entire life of the panels. After an agreed-upon period of time,the lease agreement <br /> should allow the Schools to make one of the following choices: <br /> 1.) Purchase the panels at a much reduced cost; <br /> 2.) Renegotiate a new lease agreement; <br /> 3.)Ask the solar company to remove the panels at no cost. <br /> 6. What can the schools expect in terms of lifetime costs if they lease instead of owning their <br /> systems? <br /> Leasing a solar installation from a private 3rd party entity would allow the schools to take advantage of <br /> significant federal tax incentives that are inaccessible to public entities if they were to purchase the <br /> system outright. <br /> As part of the RFP process, the schools can ask solar companies to run lifecycle cost analyses as part of <br /> their bid package.These analyses change from site to site based on various factors including space <br /> available,total on-site energy demand, shading, and electricity rates. Running these analyses is a normal <br /> part of the RFP bidding process that solar companies are prepared to undertake. <br /> Local example - OWASA has gone through an RFP process and is currently designing solar installations at <br /> 5 locations through all lease agreements. As a package and based on the terms that they negotiated, <br /> their solar installations have a positive net present value within their expected 25-year life (3%discount <br /> rate). They expect to break even around year 15 and save more than $200,000 in avoided energy bills <br /> over the life of the systems. (See full details in OWASA Agenda Packet from Sept 26, 2019). <br /> 7. How do the schools feel about the potential for ground-mounted solar in comparison to a rooftop <br /> system? <br /> Both OCS and CHCCS staff felt that a ground-mounted solar installation may be possible, but more <br /> research will be needed to determine what space is available and best-suited for this purpose. A list of <br /> potential rooftop and ground-mount sites can be proposed in the RFP that the schools release and solar <br /> companies can provide further feasibility information. <br /> 8. What specific school buildings or grounds might be good candidates for a solar installation? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.