Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-05-2001-9g
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 06-05-2001
>
Agenda - 06-05-2001-9g
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 7:15:11 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:32:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9g
Document Relationships
Minutes - 06-05-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br />Gordon -May 28, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br />II. Alternate Scenarios for Equitable Allocation of Resources <br />Below are data summaries that illustrate alternate scenarios for the allocation <br />of resources. The data are given on subsequent pages. <br />A. 1997 Bond Referendum -Parks and Open Space_ Bond Only LCurrenC_Polic~ <br />What if the County followed its recently adopted policy of allocating bond <br />funds for parks and open space over the tune period of 1997-2010? The next <br />page shows that policy along with associated data being provided to the CNATF. <br />Parklands and Recreation/Park Poy_tilationT 2000 Census <br />Facilities - 1997 Bond Referendum COSTS (Approximate figures) <br />Chapel Hill Township 79.5 96 66 96 <br />Other Six Townships 16.2 96 3496 <br />Not Attributable to One <br />Georgraphic Area 4.2 96 -- <br />B. 1997 Bond Referendum - All Projects Combined <br />What if the County followed a similar policy of allocating bond funds over the <br />time period 1997-2010, but applied the policy to all bond projects? The two <br />page "data attachment" shows the data related to that allocation of resources. <br />The bond projects in 1997 included (1) Affordable Housing $1.8 million, (2) <br />Efland Sewer Project $1.2 million, (3) Parks anal Open Space $5.0 million, with <br />$3.0 million for parklands and $3.0 million for facilities, and (4) $47 million for <br />schools, with $24 million for the Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) and <br />$23 million for the Orange County Schools (OCS). <br />All Projects - <br />1997 Bond Referendum COSTS <br />Chapel Hill Township (or CHCCS) S 1.4 96 <br />Other Six Townships (or OCS) 44.9 96 <br />Not Attributable to One <br />Geographic Area 3.7 96 <br />P elation - 2000 Census <br />(More recent figures) <br />67.1 96 <br />32.9 96 <br />C. Parklands and Recreatlon/Parks Facilities -All Fundin 5 urces 1995-2001 <br />What if the County followed a policy of allocating money from all funding <br />sources for parklands and recreation/parks facilities over the time period of <br />1995-201Q? The two page "data attachment" shows that data. <br />Parks/O en S ace Land All Funding Sources 1995-2001 Population - <br />:4cquisition and ACRES COSTS 2000, Census <br />Recreation/Parks Facili 'es PRESERVED (More recent figures) <br />Chapel Hill Township 30.3 96 51.0 96 57.196 <br />Other Six Townships 59.7 96 47.196 3 2.9 96 <br />Not Attributable to One <br />Geographic Area -- 1.9 96 <br />Please let me know if you have questions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.