Browse
Search
Minutes 01-28-2020 Assembly of Governments
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Minutes 01-28-2020 Assembly of Governments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2020 4:16:25 PM
Creation date
3/11/2020 3:56:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/28/2020
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 01-28-2020 Assembly of Governments
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 01-28-20 Assembly of Governments
Agenda Abstract - Assembly of Governments Meeting Discussion Items
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 01-28-20 Assembly of Governments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> Chair Rich said the goal is to make sure everyone is together when meetings do occur. <br /> She said this goes back for years, and when the public is engaged, all parties should be <br /> involved. <br /> Chapel Hill Council Member Ryan said the language is unclear. <br /> Chapel Hill Mayor Hemminger said all parties have different environmental restrictions, <br /> and staff wants to make sure it is working from the same assumptions, which was part of these <br /> goals. She said staff wants to have it formalized in the MOU that the parties will use the most <br /> restrictive, least restrictive, etc. She said some assumptions have been made, and staff did not <br /> feel it had the support from all of the elected officials in any kind of understanding of these <br /> processes. <br /> Chair Rich asked if the boards are heading in the right direction, and with general <br /> consensus, with the MOU, or does anyone want to offer anything about it. She said the MOU is <br /> a guiding document, and she wants to gather any remaining input. <br /> Carrboro Council Member Damon Seils said it is difficult to discuss in the abstract, but it <br /> seems like the attorneys are going in the right direction. He asked if the MOU will address a <br /> worse case scenario of total disagreement, and the options for resolution. He suggested that <br /> the attorneys explore these issues, in particular. <br /> Chapel Hill Council Member Buansi said there should be clear language about <br /> mediation and parameters, but agreed that the attorneys seem to be going in the right direction. <br /> Chapel Hill Council Member Gu said there are so many decision points, and it is <br /> important to have a roadmap or work plan, and some agreement about the type of information <br /> that must be collected. She said the current timeline is too vague, in her opinion. <br /> Mayor Lavelle said she said she wants the MOU to address what happens to an entity if <br /> it wants to get out of the process. She said Carrboro only has a 14% stake, and the land is not <br /> in Carrboro. She said a time may come when Carrboro wants to voluntarily step away, and she <br /> would like to have this process included in the MOU. <br /> Chapel Hill Council Member Anderson agreed with Commissioner Greene, but then <br /> found some confusion. She said it is her understanding that the draft MOU contains a weighted <br /> vote system, but asked if this is accurate. <br /> Chair Rich said the MOU addresses how to move forward if there is not an agreement, <br /> and a weighted vote is one option. She said the currently existing MOU says all parties must <br /> agree, and the new MOU will state the same, and Commissioner Dorosin has posed the <br /> question of"is there a better way?" <br /> Chapel Hill Council Member Anderson said the current MOU track seems reasonable. <br /> Commissioner Price said John Roberts is on the right track and she would encourage <br /> everyone to keep the process simple. She said having a work plan would be useful, as a <br /> separate process to the MOU. <br /> Chair Rich asked Commissioner Dorosin if this conversation has satisfied his <br /> questioning. She said the attorneys are waiting for the boards to give advice. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said the conversation happened, but he is not completely <br /> satisfied. He said his main point of interest is the time that is passing to accomplish anything. <br /> He said the boards have been working on this land, and the communities have been waiting, for <br /> years. He said he is interested in the MOU moving the process forward faster than it has <br /> moved thus far, and is glad to have heard the comments of his peers. He said this <br /> conversation has been a good start. <br /> 2. Orange County Complete Count Committee - Status and Efforts for 2020 Census <br /> Mayor Weaver introduced item and Todd McGee, Community Relations Director, <br /> reviewed the following information: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.