Orange County NC Website
8 <br /> 1 Chapel Hill Council Member Anderson said earlier she did not mean she did not <br /> 2 understand the purpose of the MOU, but rather she seeks clarity on point#2 and #3, and to <br /> 3 insure public input on these items earlier in the discussions. <br /> 4 Chapel Hill Council Member Anderson said the boards are not agreeing together on <br /> 5 what foundational information is needed to make decisions, or how to engage the public in <br /> 6 advance. She said it is right to do incremental steps, and she would like to see agreement on <br /> 7 what information is needed, or not needed, to make decisions and be fully informed. She said <br /> 8 the public should be engaged purposefully. She said the connectivity and environmental <br /> 9 analyses are critical to be able to make decisions. <br /> 10 Chapel Hill Council Member Parker said the two voting options are unanimity or 2/3. He <br /> 11 said the County Attorney has done a good job trying to bridge this by starting with a hope for <br /> 12 unanimity, but going to mediation and 2/3 voting if necessary. <br /> 13 Chapel Hill Council Member Parker said what is causing some confusion is that two <br /> 14 processes have been conflated: the process of figuring out the MOU (what is in it, decision <br /> 15 making processes, etc.) and the work plan itself, which should actually be a separate <br /> 16 document. <br /> 17 Carrboro Council Member Damon Seils said # 2 and 3 are important to the process, but <br /> 18 the boards need to focus on the MOU first. He said he would like to see the MOU approved <br /> 19 early on, and as quickly as possible. <br /> 20 Commissioner Greene said this vote is not like other votes the boards have taken, <br /> 21 because all are very interested in the real estate. She said there needs to be unanimous <br /> 22 agreement about the nature of the development, or mediation should be employed. <br /> 23 Chair Rich asked Commissioner Greene if she feels John Roberts is heading in right <br /> 24 direction with the draft MOU. <br /> 25 Commissioner Greene said yes. <br /> 26 Chapel Hill Council Member Huynh said the jointly planned community meeting is a <br /> 27 good idea to avoid confusion, but if there will only be one meeting he would like to insure that it <br /> 28 is recorded and posted on the website. <br /> 29 Chair Rich said there will be more than one meeting, and everything will go on the <br /> 30 Orange County website. <br /> 31 Chair Rich said the public can come to any of the BOCC's business meetings and make <br /> 32 comments. <br /> 33 Chair Rich asked if everyone feels the boards are heading in the right direction with the <br /> 34 draft MOU. <br /> 35 Chapel Hill Council Member Huynh said he is concerned about the presentation of the <br /> 36 materials, and making sure that the public is clear about the dates and locations of any <br /> 37 presentations. <br /> 38 Chair Rich said this is just a stab at a schedule, and nothing is written in stone. <br /> 39 Chapel Hill Council Member Ryan said actually no meetings are able to occur until the <br /> 40 MOU is signed. <br /> 41 Mayor Hemminger said that is not correct, and this point has been taken out of the <br /> 42 resolution. She said there will be a joint meeting once the environmental assessment is <br /> 43 completed. She said no one jurisdiction will have a special meeting for the public until the <br /> 44 information is together. <br /> 45 Chapel Hill Council Member Ryan said it also says, "we jointly agree not to initiate <br /> 46 further formal public engagement until completion of the MOU document." She asked if this <br /> 47 limits everyone to one formal meeting until the MOU is signed. <br /> 48 Mayor Hemminger said that was not the intention, rather that when meetings do occur <br /> 49 about the Greene Tract, it would include everyone together. <br />