Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-10-20; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Agenda - 03-10-20 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 03-10-20; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 4:44:56 PM
Creation date
3/5/2020 4:20:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/10/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-10-20 Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 03-10-20 Business Meeting
Minutes 03-10-2020 Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> 1 Chair Rich asked if she was referring to discussing the environmental assessment with <br /> 2 the public. <br /> 3 Carrboro Town Council Member Haven O'Donnell said no, overall public engagement. <br /> 4 Chair Rich said these decisions have not been made yet. <br /> 5 Carrboro Town Council Member Haven O'Donnell said she would want to have a feel for <br /> 6 the check-ins and if these could engage the public. <br /> 7 Chair Rich said Reverend Campbell told the BOCC that he wanted to hear one voice, <br /> 8 and not several, when it comes to this issue. She said he desires a unified voice. <br /> 9 Commissioner Price said there should be a mechanism from the beginning to include <br /> 10 community engagement in the process and schedule. <br /> 11 Commissioner Price said the boards are waiting on the MOU and its purpose. She said <br /> 12 this process has taken a long time, and wonders if there is a lack of trust. <br /> 13 John Roberts said it is a process for the boards to move forward, and it will set out <br /> 14 public engagement, staff meetings, how to resolve disputes, etc. He said currently all three <br /> 15 parties must agree unanimously for things to move forward, and there has been no forward <br /> 16 movement for a significant amount of time. <br /> 17 Commissioner Dorosin asked if options are unanimous consent, vote by the parties, or <br /> 18 by percentage of ownership. <br /> 19 John Roberts said he has a basic draft, which includes an initial meeting of appointed <br /> 20 representatives of the three boards and Managers and Attorney to try and reach an agreement. <br /> 21 He said if that does not work he suggests bringing in a mediator, and if that still does not work <br /> 22 even after a lengthy time, then allow a vote of ownership by percentages. He said this is all just <br /> 23 his proposal and is subject to change. <br /> 24 Mayor Hemminger said overall clarification was needed, as there was varying <br /> 25 terminology, it was unclear who should sign, etc. <br /> 26 Mayor Hemminger said there is a working template, and the whole has been broke into <br /> 27 pieces to make it more manageable. <br /> 28 Mayor Lavelle said it is both complicated and not complicated. She said everyone wants <br /> 29 affordable housing, open space, connectivity, etc., but it is complicated because there are three <br /> 30 joint owners, but one owner is the permit issuing authority. She said the property is located in <br /> 31 an ETJ, which is also unusual <br /> 32 Mayor Lavelle said the biggest question is how to make decisions going forward. She <br /> 33 said the only example she can think of that is somewhat similar was the Solid Waste Advisory <br /> 34 Group (SWAG). She said there was a SWAG vote regarding the recycling fee, and every <br /> 35 jurisdiction had a vote and there had to be a resolution available if unanimity could not be <br /> 36 reached. <br /> 37 Commissioner Marcoplos referred to the issue of community engagement, and said <br /> 38 everyone is committed to that process. He said the boards will schedule these meetings later <br /> 39 when there is more information to share. He said it important to keep it simple with what is <br /> 40 being done now: the Environmental Assessment, the MOU, and the school site. He said it <br /> 41 would be wise to work through these three tasks without much distraction. He said it is <br /> 42 important to get it right this time. <br /> 43 Chapel Hill Council Member Bin said the timeline is process focused. She said she <br /> 44 would like to see more about what kind of information should be collected to reach the point <br /> 45 where the boards can agree. She said her Council talked about the importance of connectivity <br /> 46 analysis, environmental assessment, and what kind of financial commitments are needed. She <br /> 47 said these things need to be presented to the public, and she would like to know when these <br /> 48 key pieces of information will be known. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.