Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DISCUSSION: In Section Ill.c., the Board awarded the two relatively low scores to two <br /> agencies because they determined that these two programs showed little or no growth <br /> over time. <br /> IV. What are the program's RESULTS? <br /> MAX CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HABITAT REBUILDING <br /> EVALUATIVE COMPONENT SCORE COMMUNITY EMPLOWERMENT EMPOWERMENT FOR TOGETHER OF <br /> SELF-HELP FUND HUMANITY THE TRIANGLE <br /> a. Actual results for FY 2017-18 5 N/A 5 5 5 5 <br /> appear consistent with the <br /> program's goals and activities. <br /> b. Agency and program budgets 5 N/A 5 5 5 4 <br /> demonstrate sustainability over 3 <br /> years? <br /> c. Actual results for FY 20117-18 10 N/A 10 10 10 0 <br /> support a positive impact on <br /> program customers/participants. <br /> d. Actual cost per program 5 N/A 5 5 3 0 <br /> unit/individuals for FY 2017-18 <br /> appears reasonable and <br /> appropriate. <br /> TOTAL SCORE FOR RESULTS 25 N/A 25 25 23 9 <br /> DISCUSSION: The Board determined that the Rebuilding Together of the Triangle <br /> application did not address Sections Ill.c. and Ill.d. which resulted in a zero score. <br /> Section III does not apply to the Center for Community Self-Help application because it <br /> is a new application. <br /> IV. Adjournment —On a motion by Jenn Sykes and seconded by Cain Twyman, <br /> the Board voted to adjourn at 7:40 PM. <br /> Submitted by Diane Beecham, Community Development Specialist <br /> Page 3 <br />