Browse
Search
BOA agenda 021020
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
BOA agenda 021020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2020 9:29:36 AM
Creation date
2/10/2020 9:27:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/10/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> <br />Scott and Erica Olive said there would be about 100 people on-site at one time. They <br />don’t expect to have all the parking spaces filled for events; they just wanted to provide <br />ample parking. <br />Sam Nye (Engineer) and the Olives made note of existing traffic concerns, such as <br />speeding, transfer trucks, and lack of drainage on NC 49. <br />xExisting Farm Operations –Norman Atkins’ nephew attended the meeting on behalf of <br />his uncle, who runs a large farming operation on the parcels across the street. He asked if <br />the lacrosse facility would impact their farming operation in any way. He also noted that <br />farming can produce some offensive smells. For instance, they spray the tobacco leaves <br />with fatty alcohol (which is very potent) to prevent the growth of suckers. If people at the <br />lacrosse facility complain about the smell, will that cause problems for the farmers? <br />Answers: Michael Harvey (Current Planning) said that farming is a land use protected <br />under State law. This includes smells resulting from pesticides, fertilizers, etc. Game <br />attendees could complain about the smell, but the Planning Department would not take <br />any enforcement action against the farmers for it. <br />The Olives were not aware of the smells from neighboring farms, but they made note of <br />them. <br />xFuture Development –People were concerned about the possible development of the <br />non-lacrosse portion of the property. Are the owners planning on a high-density <br />development? <br />Answers:The property owners/applicants do not have any immediate plans to develop <br />the residual acreage. They said they haven’t started to explore that yet. <br />Molly Boyle (Current Planning) said the minimum lot size in that area of the County is <br />40,000 sq. ft. (just under one acre), which would suggest a high-density subdivision <br />might be possible. However, there is no potential for sewer connection out there. Also, <br />the property is in the Back Creek Protected Watershed, which limits the property to 12% <br />impervious surface area (i.e.,only 12% of the property can be covered with surfaces like <br />concrete, gravel, and building footprints). There is also a 65’ stream buffer required for <br />the stream on the lot. No buildings or septic can go in the stream buffer area. <br />In summary, the lot has the potential to be subdivided but not at a high density. The lots <br />would have to be supported by septic, which means the quality of the soils will also affect <br />the size of the subdivision. <br />*** <br />Molly Boyle asked attendees to sign the sign-in sheet before leaving. She encouraged attendees <br />to contact Planning with any questions. When a hearing date is scheduled for the project, <br />Planning staff will send out notices for the neighbors about the hearing. <br /> <br />i Seven neighbors attended the meeting, but only four signed the sign-in sheet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.