Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
4 <br /> j j .<:� 0' 21, 11!w ' 4: `411 <br /> 0 (1*0 .1.41 .z�"pCxj .f..��S 1-p1'y.���;.t�.t{:,� J .�}��}�..t:�f.�. 'g�"'j(�.�1 ',pt`Ir..�,�x`� .1...��I'�.:�..tfiIp' .A41 ' . q '.t'J. + .�.�.t':��F .p��r�� � 'p€�.�.t't.��. <br /> C..7.S '1 l. b:�,�`.s f. 200141 <br /> d. Y .L ' .7 { �i.it.i. 1'Vd, .1. .i, YVX d 7Y t.% .iT..3i l t tJ6' itf. �. f ywir! 1 4 . �it ff. v [. xT C.. '.1 .� Y ..'. ' .. .3 .) 1t..E .d. 0', .' . f} � . . .1 <br /> DR .IFT 2 / 0 /02 <br /> IP Work Group Recommendation <br /> PlanningP for <br /> rocess Joint <br /> Count /Town Parks and Open <br /> Y <br /> Space Projects <br /> February 27 , 2002 <br /> On January 31, the Intergovernmental Parks (IP) Work Group met to review the <br /> County 's 9110101 draft policy statement "Use of County Funds for Joint Parks and <br /> Open Space Projects . " The Chapel Hill Town Council and the County Board of <br /> Commissioners had asked the IP Work Group to review the policy statement in light <br /> of issues raised and develop a recommendation . <br /> The following recommendations were developed via facilitated discussion of the policy <br /> draft and Chapel Hill Town Council comments . IP Work Group members asked that <br /> the ideas be written . up and presented for a recommendation on February 27. <br /> A . General Areas of Common Interest/ Consensus <br /> There are a number of general concepts related to planning for joint parks <br /> that are shared by all jurisdictions : <br /> 1 . An interest in avoiding overlap and delays in completing projects <br /> 2 . A recognition that County oversight/overview of joint parks and <br /> open space projects which the County funds wholly or partly is <br /> appropriate <br /> 3 . That a planning policy should address both specific 2001 bond <br /> projects and new joint parks/open space projects yet to be developed <br /> In addition, the IP Work Group discussed the draft policy and the Town of <br /> Chapel Hills issues . The group agreed by consensus that some objectives from <br /> the draft policy statement "Use of County Funds for Joint Parks and Open Space <br /> Projects " should be retained. The following list contains the points <br /> recommended for retention (with locational reference in the 9110101 draft <br /> policy statement in parentheses): <br /> 4 . The " Conditional Approval" process , for the purpose of new joint <br /> projects only (objective 1 ) <br />