Orange County NC Website
r 173 <br /> Aquatics / Community Center at Homestead Park <br /> Town of Chapel Hill <br /> Energy Conservation Evaluation <br /> The purpose of this evaluation is to review basic requirements and identify options to utilize energy <br /> efficient and renewable energy source components in the new aquatic center being studied for the Town <br /> of Chapel Hill (Town ) . This information , which should be considered in all designs options to be <br /> developed for the new facility, focuses on the natatorium space , which is the room that will house one or <br /> more indoor swimming , recreation and therapeutic pools . Included in this overview are responses to <br /> relevant comments listed in the March 23 , 2000 , Phase One Needs report , indoor air quality concerns , <br /> moisture control , building durability and operation and maintenance issues . Particular attention is given <br /> to demonstrating compliance with the Town 's building energy conservation ordinance . <br /> Newer indoor swimming pools are generally the highest operating cost facilities operated by local <br /> governments , in terms of annual operating costs per square for energy and maintenance costs . The <br /> pool water must be heated year round to temperatures in the 78 to 85 degree and higher temperature <br /> range . Similar space temperatures must be maintained in the winter heating season . Large pumps run <br /> continuously to filter the pool water volumes . High rates of moisture evaporation from the water surface <br /> translate into high costs for mechanical ventilation , dehumidification , and cooling of the room space. <br /> Added to these energy costs , are significant chemical treatment and make up water costs . <br /> Because of these high energy, water and treatment costs , most. aquatic centers utilize a variety of <br /> energy saving and renewable measures not only to save money, but to make these buildings last longer . <br /> Popular natatorium measures include pool covers , solar pool heating and waste heat recovery . The - <br /> potential energy savings are large enough that the U . S . Department of Energy developed a program <br /> area specifically to promote saving energy in swimming pools . Information and results from this - - <br /> program , which is called Reduce Swimming Pool Energy Costs ( RSPEC ) is available from the websito <br /> www . eren . doe .gov/rspec . <br /> COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN ENERGY EFFICIENCY ORDINANCE <br /> In Chapel Hill , an energy efficient design for the new aquatic facility is mandated by a town ordinance : <br /> Energy -Conservation in Design and Construction of New and. Renovated Town Buildiftgs Section 57108 <br /> • of thee Chapel Hill . ordinance states that, 'Any buildings built with Town funds shall •be designed to. achieve <br /> a goal of using at least 30 % less energy than required by the North Carolina State Building Codes ' <br /> (NCSBC's) ._ The relevant part of the NCSBC is Volume X, Energy Code* for Commercial and Residential. • . <br /> Buildings . <br /> Demonstrating a 30 % efficiency performance over Volume X requirements of a proposed natatorium <br /> design is somewhat problematic . The available building energy analysis tools . such . as DOE 11 , BLAST , <br /> TRACL and HAP 4 target people oriented • buildings such as offices , schools and . stores : Therefore a <br /> customized analysis would be * required utilizing one of the above tools , coupled with spreadsheet <br /> analysis of * the pool performance . characteristics . This • level of analysis will add significant cost to the <br /> *design * of the facility white producing results of debatable accuracy . <br /> Consequently, a more pragmatic . • analysis is proposed - here to satisfy the 30 % design performance <br /> requirement . This method involves quantitatively or qualitatively improving the significant Volume X <br /> provisions that affect aquatic center designs . The proposed method is described below in items 1 through <br /> 1 7 . <br />