Orange County NC Website
2 <br /> 5 . To review and inform the municipalities and County concerning parks needs and <br /> potential opportunities <br /> 6 . To develop parameters for parks standards ( leaving flexibility for the actual standards <br /> to vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction within these parameters ) <br /> 7 . To develop and coordinate public education and public outreach on parks issues <br /> ( coordinated brochures , etc . ) <br /> The initial meeting of the IPWG was held on December 7 , 2000 , following appointments by <br /> all Town and County elected boards and both school boards . During 2001 , 2002 and 2003 , <br /> the IPWG met three and usually four times per year . <br /> A wide variety of topic discussion and information - sharing took place during this timeframe , <br /> including : <br /> 1 . Planning for the November 2001 County Parks and Open Space Bond <br /> 2 . Creation of a brochure about all parks and recreation opportunities in the County <br /> ( currently being completed ) <br /> 3 . Review of Parkland Acquisitions and Opportunities ( such as the County' s Lands <br /> Legacy Program acquisitions ) <br /> 4 . Review and Comment on New Projects Underway ( such as Southern Park , <br /> CHATPEC , Little River Park and the Homestead Aquatic Center) <br /> 5 . Study of New Opportunities ( including greenways opportunities and basic operating <br /> principles for parks , among others ) , and <br /> 6 . Items Referred to the IPWG by Elected Boards ( including the review of OWASA- <br /> owned land for park purposes and the draft Joint Parks Planning Process and Policy ) <br /> On June 30 , 2003 , the three-year initial term of the IPWG expired . The resolution adopted <br /> by all elected boards in 2000 called for an evaluation of the project after three years . The <br /> attached report provides this analysis , as well as thoughts by IPWG members on the <br /> successes and challenges of the initiative , and ideas on re- establishing the Work Group . <br /> The only substantive change proposed is to add a fourth meeting each year ( up from three ) <br /> to put the group on a quarterly schedule . <br /> A resolution is attached that would re - establish the Work Group . If the Board wishes to <br /> propose renewal of the IPWG , with changes as deemed necessary , staff would forward this <br /> report and resolution to the other elected boards and ask them to also re- establish the work <br /> group . <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT : None . <br /> RECOMMENDATION ( S ) : The Manager recommends that the Board review and adopt the <br /> report and resolution , with changes as needed , to re - establish the IP Work Group . Staff <br /> would then convey the resolution and report to the Towns for authorization from the elected <br /> boards of Hillsborough , Chapel Hill and Carrboro . <br />