JMRPWG agenda 052599 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• It is recommended that all new school sites be planned to include park �- facilities and that existing school sites be improved with recreation and park amenities where it is mutually beneficial to the school system and governmental jurisdictions ) to do so . . • Standardize all documents used by the three jurisdictions when contracting with private recreation providers .P p (Personnel, Facilities , Program Management) • That Orange County publish and update annually the listing of private recreation vendors and facilities on the new information referral network currently being developed in Orange County . Also , include models of existing, successful public/private partnerships , i . e . Triangle Sportsplex, Chapel Hill Senior Center, etc . • Establish a bi-annual meeting or forum for private and public recreation providers for information sharing and establishing new public/private initiatives . While these recommendations lay promising groundwork for long-range planning, other practical possibilities must be explored to achieve success . Tune did not permit the development of the mechanisms (i . e . ,, intergovernmental work groups , etc . ) to pursue the thorough .investigation of the following matters . The . .. Work Group believes that it is imperative that they end their report by delineating these future concerns . Future Directions/Trends Bond referenda for recreation and park projects • Comprehensive program planning to avoid duplication of services and service baps • Joint ventures in the area of After- School programming • Status of swimming pools in Orange County • Mechanisms for funding facilities by all jurisdictions Recreation and Parks District Tax Funding equity issues (who pays for what, now and in the future ?) • Joint School/Park use of the Greene Tract Page 13