Orange County NC Website
Potential Recreational Use of OWASA Property <br /> October 15 , 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> On other tracts, such as the biosolids land orothe two sites reserved for future elevated <br /> storage tanks , the NRTS Committee believed it to be in OWASA' s best interest to defer <br /> consideration of alternative uses until the future utility needs for those properties are <br /> better defined through the Comprehensive Water and Sewer Master Plan or, in the case of <br /> the tank sites , by local regulatory requirements for setbacks , buffering, and . so forth. <br /> These three mission-oriented considerations — utility operations, water quality, and future <br /> options -- are abbreviated as (uo), (wq), and (f) in Table 2 , where they indicate the NRTS - <br /> Committee ' s rationale for recommending - against certain uses or activities . <br /> Major Categories of Property <br /> The Committee first considered possible uses OWASA '. s largest :categories of land (see <br /> Table 1 ) : Cane Creek property (inside and outside the '/z-mile Critical Area) , biosolids <br /> application property, Stone Quarry. Reservoir., and the elevated storage tank sites . <br /> Cane Creek Property The NRTS - Committee believed that property within the V2-mile <br /> Critical Area should be considered for virtually no recreational activities , due -to water <br /> — quality concerns. Limited use of certain land in the Critical Area for research or _ <br /> educational purposes might be appropriate . Certain low-impact uses, such as a nature <br /> center, hiking/jogging trails , .and other educational/research activities might be acceptable <br /> on OWASA property outside the Critical Area, but . any uses requiring modification to the <br /> land for clearing; grading, parking, or vehicular ac4 . <br /> cess- would not be acceptable . <br /> Similarly, the NRTS Committee recommended only limited activities be allowed on the <br /> portion of the existing Cane Creek recreation * site draining to the lake (inside the _ <br /> watershed) , but that - additional -uses might be allowed on the back portion of that : <br /> which is located outside the watershed: <br /> property, . . . . . <br /> Biosolids Application Property —. Although most of OWASA ' s biosolids are currently <br /> applied under strict State regulation to private farmland, it has been OWASA ' s long-term <br /> strategy_ to accumulate .suff r th cient land foe future, _when less private property will . <br /> remain available for land application. A systematic review of biosolids. management <br /> options — including the production of Class .A material , possible co -composting with <br /> municipal solid waste , further moisture reduction, and so forth = is included in the <br /> Water/Sewer Master Plan project. Such options could reduce the eventual need for :land, <br /> but until this information is available, the NRTS Committee recommended that OWASA <br /> maintain its maximum range of future options and not consider recreational uses of <br /> biosolids property . <br /> that no recreational <br /> Stone Quarry Property Similarly , the Committee recommended <br /> Q rY P �Y Y � . <br /> uses be considered at OWASA ' s Stone Quarry -property until the future use of that site is . <br /> more clearly established . <br />