Browse
Search
JMRPWG agenda 052599
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Joint Master Recreation and Parks Work Group
>
JMRPWG agenda 052599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 5:11:37 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 4:59:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5/ 26/ 99 <br /> focus for future parks and recreation development could be <br /> targeted to smaller, less - intensive .neighborhood .parks and larger <br /> district parks . <br /> • By combining active and low - impact recreation needs at the district <br /> park level ( 100 - plus acres )., it may be possible to develop trails and <br /> retain natural areas on the : perimeter while dedicating the interior <br /> to active facilities and " hidden " parking areas . Care must be <br /> exercised to ensure the integrity of natural areas , however . <br /> Buffers should contain enough land and mature tree canopy to <br /> minimize sound and lighting to an , acceptable level . <br /> • Place future programmed active recreation . facilities in . larger district <br /> parks and make neighborhood parks low - impact . <br /> • Look countywide to define future neighborhood and district parks <br /> working with UNC , OWASA and other entities . <br /> • Related to, the above , land acquisition for parks is needed now to <br /> begin to identify . and save priority parklands . Several local <br /> governments ( including some city/ county joint efforts ) .are <br /> presently engaged in this ( sometimes called " land :banking ) . <br /> D . Mechanisms for Implementing Goals Through <br /> Capital . Improvement Plans ( CIP 's ) and . * Long - <br /> term Parkland Acquisition <br /> To be developed . A meeting of the Managers , elected representatives and " <br /> staffs is being scheduled to address these issues . <br /> E . Coordination . Opportunities wiW UNC / <br /> Implications of UNC Expansion <br /> The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill provides both facilities that - are <br /> used by the greater town and County populations , and users of local <br /> recreational facilities in the form of students who live on and ( particularly ) <br /> off- campus . <br /> ' Currently , UNC provides the following. recreational facilities for its students . . <br /> Policy does not allow .use by non - students , although this policy is not strictly <br /> enforced and man y Town residents avail themselves of facilities like the <br /> Botanical Gardens , Finley Golf Course , Kenan Stadium , Fetzer Field/ Belk <br /> Track, and groups like Rainbow Soccer use fields owned by the U.niversity .. <br /> In the 1996 report " Recreation and Park Issues In Orange County ", the work <br /> group " determined that in applying standards to the population of Orange <br /> County that 11 , 000 people ( students living in dormitories and <br /> fraternities/sororities ) could. be subtracted from population .totals in deriving <br /> park acreage needs . The assumption underlying this adjustment is that these <br /> students reside on campus and have their recreation needs met wholly by. <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.