Browse
Search
JMRPWG agenda 052599
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Joint Master Recreation and Parks Work Group
>
JMRPWG agenda 052599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 5:11:37 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 4:59:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5/ 26/ 99 <br /> � C . Impediments to Location of New Facilities <br /> In recent years , more attention has been paid to the impacts of recreational <br /> facilities . In particular, impacts of lighting , intensity of use , traffic and noise <br /> have been cited as posing negative impacts to nearby neighborhoods in the <br /> location of recreational . facilities that involve active recreation fields , <br /> programs and - lighting , <br /> The Parks and Recreation Directors met with staff to explore this issue . Since <br /> these concerns are almost exclusively related to active and low - impact <br /> recreation , a definition of active and passive recreation might be an <br /> important first step to addressing impacts . <br /> While many definitions coul be developed for the terms active recre dation <br /> and low - impact recreation , the following * might serve as a starting point <br /> Active Recreation : Recreation facilities programmable for structured <br /> activities, such as ballfields, tennis courts and picnic shelters . <br /> Low4mpact Recreation : Facilities that are designed for individual rather than <br /> structured activities, such as hiking trails, open picnic tables, open fields and <br /> other natural areas . <br /> Having defined the nature of active recreation , several points were noted as <br /> critical to resolution of future siting problems : <br /> • Examples from other communities that have public + education on <br /> facility location and public input into decisions ; <br /> • Point out the positive components of nearby active recreation , <br /> • Focus on greater community needs and the 4downside of not <br /> providing active facilities ; <br /> • Work to better define -the type of land appropriate for active <br /> facilities with lights - locating adjacent to schools and other . more - <br /> intensive uses ; <br /> • Stress accessibility to pedestrians , bicycle riders ; and public <br /> transportation ; <br /> • -If active facilities must be located in areas adjacent to residential <br /> communities, buy , larger land area to develop buffers for shielding <br /> of light andm noise . <br /> More analysis is needed to explore the . change in attitude toward park <br /> impacts , However, the following suggestions may be ways to mitigate <br /> concerns about active recreation facilities while meeting the public need : <br /> • The co - location of schools and parks can address this issue with <br /> appropriate design . <br /> • Co - locating schools with parks may have superseded the old <br /> concept of community ( mid - level ) parks . If this is the case , the <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.