Browse
Search
JMRPWG agenda 052599
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Joint Master Recreation and Parks Work Group
>
JMRPWG agenda 052599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 5:11:37 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 4:59:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 / 18/ 99 <br /> one Hillsborough town Commissioner, and one Orange County <br /> Commissioner . <br /> The Schools and Land Use Councils held their first meeting on <br /> October 8 , 1997 and have met bi - monthly ( with one or two <br /> exceptions ) since that time . Most meetings have been joint <br /> although there have been a few meetings specific to one council <br /> or the other . To date , the councils have : <br /> • Adopted a Resolution of Intent Concerning the Role of the Schools <br /> and Land Use Councils ; <br /> • adopted a Structure for Communication that defines procedures <br /> whereby local governments and schools systems keep each other <br /> apprised of activities/decisions that may impact the other ; and <br /> • initiated discussion on a Memorandum of Agreement on Co4ocation <br /> of Facilities ( see Appendix Q . r <br /> C . Impediments to Location of New Facilities <br /> In recent years , more attention has been paid to the ancillary impacts of <br /> recreational facilities . In particular, impacts of lighting , intensity of use , traffic <br /> and noise have been cited as posing negative impacts to nearby <br /> neighborhoods in the location of recreational facilities that involve active <br /> recreation fields , programs and lighting . <br /> The Parks and Recreation Directors met with staff to explore this issue . Since <br /> these concerns are almost exclusively related to active and low - impact <br /> recreation , a definition of active and passive recreation might be an <br /> important first step to addressing impacts . <br /> While many definitions could be developed for the terms active .recreation <br /> and lowjmpact recreation , the following might serve as a starting point : <br /> Active Recreation : Recreation facilities programmable for structured <br /> activities, such as ballfields, tennis courts and picnic shelters . <br /> Low-Impact Recreation : Facilities that are designed for individual rather than <br /> structured activities, such as hiking trails, open picnic tables, open fields and <br /> other natural areas . <br /> Having defined the nature of active recreation , several points were noted as <br /> critical to resolution of future siting problems . <br /> • Examples from other communities that have public education on <br /> facility location and public input into decisions ; <br /> • Point out the positive components of nearby active recreation ; <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.