Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Draft <br /> 4/ 28/ 99 <br /> Wake .Count <br /> Cary Yes Fair Market Value # Acres times <br /> Fair Market Value <br /> Raleigh No Impact Fee Schedule and $ 223 to $ 375 per <br /> Zone Map dwelling unit <br /> Durham No Impact Fee Schedule $ 183 . 38 to <br /> $ 296 . 99 per <br /> dwelling unit <br /> Guilford County No None N /A. <br /> Greensboro No None N /A <br /> Charlotte - No None N /A <br /> Mecklenburg <br /> Davis California Yes Impact Fee Schedule 2000 per acre <br /> Boulder County , Yes Fair Market Value 25 acres per <br /> CO 1000 occu ants <br /> Many of the above local governments have developed alternative <br /> models to the acquisition and/or dedication of land for recreational <br /> purposes. Additional details on the specifics of each program may be <br /> Is <br /> found in Appendix G. <br /> -z.;•7<..• -x:- , s • �reszr•: x,x,.f, . W s: _x`x ;�:� - �te:v. ..,,y,x - , .ram,. ..y;..., - <br /> •sy"e fi.. •",n;m;s :T'S?'A}'- _ .ySyt :•a:.:':"'s, e '�'xfi;<':."e'-. .^„?{.;,�F.c'4yEr <br /> �: : e:-•�.. .. » .. - <br /> - ,:,€,r,;d>> !.e:> <br /> 2 <br /> n. e <br /> ... .:_: .:, .: i ;.. .; .,+.. , [. :r. �•:) ::Ya �1.--.. :i,=`%`� - ;ys`:j:."' i:t::. -i 'F: : .:<.-: .;pia "= <br /> p , <br /> L- � rx „'vt .. <br /> j) �, i <br /> L. Y..t� >. ......st ....,a'.:ii.% ..>n. s <br /> �.-'c.y........ .<,:. . ' Nt <br /> rr <br /> NOW <br /> >w..:..a�°x,..,..>~........ - .. �..:a.Ms•,,.9:..fas.^.:�• .£.x..�. ., . ...,. . ,. ".a{d�..,.xr'?9:r.•.kg..: �=` .'.isfi: <�>........a <br /> < < More-detailed recommendations will be drafted and handed <br /> out on 4 -28 > > <br /> One of the important results of this report will be the laying of <br /> groundwork for future matching funds • and grant programs - many of <br /> which require a set of goals , objectives and criteria . <br /> a . - Inter] urisdictionaI efforts at standardizing parks ' and <br /> recreation requirements <br /> be Joint siting , design , and management of school and <br /> ffi <br /> park sites across jurisdictions <br /> c . Public/ private partnerships across jurisdictions <br /> d . Joint Capital Facilities Plan for Parks and Recreation <br /> eel Long - term Recreation and Parks Council <br /> ( future follow - up , maintain database , public relations , <br /> develop future bond proposals ) <br /> f . Open ` Facilities Policy <br /> 1 . . .County , towns and OWASA <br /> 2 . 'UNC and schools <br /> 3 . Duke <br /> g . Using CIP to recommend acquisition <br /> 33 <br />