Browse
Search
JMRPWG agenda 032499
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Joint Master Recreation and Parks Work Group
>
JMRPWG agenda 032499
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:56:16 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 4:53:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft <br /> 3 / 24/ 99 <br /> . <br /> :. <br /> . . . . <br /> ( from subcommittee ) <br /> Acquisition of Land <br /> . One method for accumulating funds to purchase land for <br /> parks and recreation is to require new developments to make <br /> payments into a dedicated fund . Under most versions of this <br /> system - which is called a " payment in lieu " - local <br /> governments try to determine the recreational impact a new <br /> development will generate , and on that basis require the <br /> development either to donate land or to make a payment in lieu <br /> of making the donation . <br /> Appendix G indicates the way in which Orange County and <br /> Carrboro calculate this payment . Chapel Hill negotiates based <br /> on individual development proposals ; Hillsborough seeks <br /> dedication of land , not payments in lieu . The attachment also <br /> shows the efforts of other selected jurisdictions in acquiring <br /> land . <br /> It has been difficult for the governments to quantify how <br /> well the current system works . Carrboro reports that its fee <br /> structure is sufficient that many developments choose to <br /> provide private recreation facilities rather than making the <br /> payment . Similarly, Chapel Hill does not have detailed central <br /> records of what the results of negotiated fees or land donations <br /> has been . Hillsborough does not have details . <br /> Orange County does have a record , since it has required <br /> II <br /> payments since 1988 , and has accumulated these payments in <br /> a fund . The fund has brought in $ 425 , 000 , <br /> It is clear in a broad overview, however, that the current <br /> system of land acquisition has . been insufficient to meet <br /> citizens ' needs . Part of the problem is that, while recreational <br /> facilities may be developed privately, these are not open to the <br /> public . Also , small parcels of land that are donated for public <br /> use often end up being of use neither to the public nor to the <br /> development itself, since their size and location makes them <br /> difficult to use . <br /> 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.