Browse
Search
IPRWG report 061199
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Intergovernmental Parks Work Group
>
Other documents
>
IPRWG report 061199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:01:45 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 3:47:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5/ 26/ 99 <br /> ¢ 9 _ <br /> E 2 <br /> 1/my 3- <br /> II . RECOM 41 A`� IONS <br /> K , .. .. mob .. . . �� amarmytea : <br /> One of the important results of this report will be the laying of groundwork <br /> for future matching funds and grant programs - - many of which require a set <br /> of goals , objectives and criteria . As Orange County , Chapel Hill , Carrboro and <br /> Hillsborough develop , the nature of future park and recreation provision will <br /> likely include cooperative ventures among the local governments and <br /> partnerships with organizations such as the school systems , OWASA , UNC <br /> and Duke . Planning for this eventuality should begin now , to ensure that <br /> valuable opportunities are not lost . These concepts were in fact , the reason <br /> for this effort , as described in the Assembly of Governments and Manager 's <br /> reports from 1996/ 1997 , <br /> In its deliberations , the Master Recreation and Parks Work Group has <br /> developed recommendations in nine key areas : <br /> l <br /> A . Create a " Parks and Resource Lands Council " <br /> In developing plans for long - term recreation and parks planning , <br /> the Work Group has identified a need for a permanent joint <br /> Parks and Resource Lands Council . For example , this council <br /> might include one elected official and one citizen from each <br /> jurisdiction , along with representatives from the school systems , <br /> UNC , OWASA and Duke . The Council could meet quarterly to <br /> address follow - up concerns in the areas discussed in this report . <br /> The opportunity in this Work Group to bring all of the different <br /> local governments to the table has been useful and informative , <br /> and the Work Group feels that this momentum could be <br /> continued through a long - term mechanism . While the actual <br /> duties of the Council would need to be determined , some areas <br /> of responsibility might include : <br /> • Develop and periodically review coordinated standards ; <br /> • Develop future bond proposals for parks and recreation ; <br /> • Provide input and a coordinating mechanism for updates of <br /> future recreation plans in the different jurisdictions ; <br /> • Make recommendations on allocation of future bond moneys <br /> for parks and recreation ; <br /> • Develop grant applications and alternative funding sources ; <br /> ` Maintain and update the Inventory of Parks and Recreation <br /> Facilities developed as part of this effort , <br /> F Create and maintain an inventory of properties dedicated or <br /> accepted as part of the development process ; <br /> • Monitor success of efforts to protect significant natural areas <br /> t <br /> as identified in the Natural Areas Inventory , watershed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.