Browse
Search
IPRWG report 061199
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Intergovernmental Parks Work Group
>
Other documents
>
IPRWG report 061199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:01:45 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 3:47:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5/ 26/ 99. <br /> suitability for wildlife corridors , woodland trails and greenways , in this <br /> setting . Examples might include : <br /> Wildlife Corridor Evaluation Criteria <br /> • Located along perennial streams , or ridges connecting watershed <br /> basins and their perennial streams <br /> • Located away from residential structures to preserve privacy <br /> • Connects and includes identified natural areas and wildlife habitat <br /> and other areas of public interest <br /> • Privately held unless dedicated to public entity - no public access <br /> unless granted by property owner/ public entity <br /> • No trails , except as existing from the movement of wildlife/ people <br /> Woodland Trails ( Rural Trail Links ) Evaluation Criteria <br /> • Located along an identified primary corridor system <br /> • Located away from natural areas and wildlife habitat , or in such <br /> fashion as to minimize impact on these areas <br /> • Links parks , urban greenways systems and existing open space <br /> areas such as Eno River State Park <br /> • Consistent with a long - term regional trails system <br /> • Located in areas with minimal streamway and adjoining lands <br /> erosion potential <br /> • Located away from residential structures to preserve privacy <br /> • Located in areas where periodic access for emergency vehicles can <br /> be sited <br /> Greenway Evaluation Criteria <br /> • Located along streamway systems in urban or surrounding areas <br /> • Co - located with existing easements ( such as utility easements ) <br /> • Located as far as possible from residences to preserve privacy <br /> • Located no closer than 25 feet to the stream bank <br /> • Stream crossings should be avoided whenever possible and grade <br /> separated when necessary <br /> • Located to ensure that minimum disruption of the trail would result <br /> from repair or replacement of utilities <br /> • Located to connect existing neighborhoods , parks and services <br /> • Located to allow for emergency vehicle access <br /> With these priorities in mind , the long - term potential for a few <br /> carefully - sited rustic rural trails linking some urban greenways or <br /> parks to existing and future rural linear parks and open space does <br /> exist . Plans for development of any coordinated intra - County trail <br /> system should be developed with linkages to regional plans for parks <br /> and trails . Linkages along the Haw River , Eno River . State Park , New <br /> Hope Creek , Jordan Lake and future rails - to - trails initiatives will likely <br /> be critical components of a long - range regional trails system . The Joint <br /> Planning Area Strategy Map shows the beginnings of such a system <br /> that was envisioned in 1987 . While considerable further work is <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.