Browse
Search
IPRWG report 061199
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Intergovernmental Parks Work Group
>
Other documents
>
IPRWG report 061199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:01:45 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 3:47:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 / 26 / 99 <br /> 2 . Wildlife Corridors <br /> In 1988 , the Triangle Land Conservancy developed an Inventory of <br /> Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats for Orange County . In identifying <br /> 64 of the most significant sites countywide , the Inventory also <br /> identified and addressed the importance of preserving wildlife corridors <br /> along selected streams and ridges as connectors . These connectors <br /> provide habitat and allow migrating wildlife to move between larger <br /> open land masses and water bodies . In many of these corridors a <br /> primitive trail system exists , formed by years of use by wildlife and <br /> local hikers , although many of the lands in the corridor are privately - <br /> held . <br /> The need for this green skeleton will increase in the future as <br /> development continues to occur . The proposed wildlife corridor <br /> network in the 1988 Inventory connects the Jordan Lake lands to <br /> University Lake , and Cane Creek Reservoir to the Eno River and Little <br /> River . This corridor has been incorporated in the Orange County <br /> Comprehensive Plan as part of the Resource Protection Area category . <br /> Much of the wildlife corridor lies within floodplain or poorly - drained <br /> land that would not be developed , but important overland connectors <br /> exist along several ridges . <br /> Attempts to protect this corridor in its natural state are currently <br /> pursued through the County 's voluntary Flexible Development <br /> ordinance . Other corridors may also be important to the natural eco - <br /> system and wildlife habitat . <br /> 3 . Linkages between Greenways and Linear Parks <br /> There are clear distinctions between greenways designed for human <br /> recreational use and wildlife corridors to be maintained in a natural <br /> state . A third component of the system is the existing / planned <br /> network of open space in the County , areas such as Eno River State <br /> Park , Duke Forest , and the planned Riverwalk in Hillsborough . These <br /> areas are apparent as ` nodes " or junctions in the green infrastructure <br /> of the County , often connected by stream or wildlife corridors . This <br /> type of network also exists in the urban areas , where greenways serve <br /> to connect many Town parks . <br /> As the County and towns continue to grow and develop , retention of a <br /> green corridor concept will be important . Additionally , ways to link <br /> rural linear parks and open space accessible to the public to Town <br /> greenways at a few key junctions could greatly expand low - impact <br /> recreational opportunities . Identification of strategic corridors ( rural <br /> trail links ) that can tie these pieces of the open space network will be <br /> needed in the long - term . <br /> 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.