Browse
Search
IPRWG report 061199
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Intergovernmental Parks Work Group
>
Other documents
>
IPRWG report 061199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:01:45 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 3:47:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
important to be consistent with surrounding land uses . Ideas on ways to mitigate <br /> the impacts of larger active facilities include co - location of schools and parks , <br /> combining active and low - impact recreation in larger park settings to buffer <br /> residential areas , and the need for a proactive land acquisition program to <br /> purchase lands for long -term use as parks ( and/ or schools ) . <br /> The potential for coordinating parks planning exists beyond the scope of the local <br /> governments involved in this effort . In particular, the report notes the significant <br /> potential for coordination with UNC , OWASA and Duke University in meeting <br /> long -term needs of mutual interest . While UNC provides many facilities used by <br /> students ( and local residents ) , there is also an undefined impact on local <br /> recreation facilities from faculty and staff of the University . Programs such as the <br /> Carolina Outdoor Recreation Center offer a means for sharing resources , and the <br /> potential exists for collaboration on future recreational facilities with UNC . <br /> Likewise , OWASA currently provides recreation facilities at both University Lake <br /> and Cane Creek Reservoir . OWASA holds over 3 , 000 acres of land in the County, <br /> some of which appears to offer the opportunity for coordinated recreational use . <br /> A memo from the OWASA Board ( Appendix F) indicates a willingness to discuss <br /> certain parcels for future public use . And finally , Duke Forest also provides a <br /> recreational resource to County citizens . While concerns about protecting the <br /> integrity of the forest resources will be paramount, opportunities exist to work <br /> with Duke in the future , particularly in terms of carefully- located trails that fit <br /> with the University 's plans . <br /> 3 . Adequate Provision of Parkland and Natural Corridors <br /> One of the most prominent needs identified is to preserve green corridors , <br /> whether in an urban or rural setting . This section of the report addresses the <br /> potential for linking some existing and proposed greenway networks in Chapel <br /> Hill , Carrboro and Hillsborough to future parks and * regional open space such as <br /> Eno River State Park and Duke Forest . <br /> The importance of existing and future greenways in the Towns is noted , as well <br /> as the existence of a schematic plan for greenways extending from the Chapel <br /> Hill /Carrboro area into the Rural Buffer, developed in 1986 as part of the Joint <br /> Planning Area Land Use Plan . Wildlife corridors in the rural areas were introduced <br /> into County planning efforts through the 1988 Inventory of Natural Areas and <br /> Wildlife Habitat, and are important to the overall County and regional ecosystem <br /> as part of the " green infrastructure . " These corridors are undeveloped riparian <br /> stream corridors or overland connectors that exist in a natural state . Any trails <br /> would exist only as they have evolved over time by use of wildlife or humans . <br /> However , as the County and Towns continue to grow , it will become important to <br /> link Town parks to regional corridors such as Eno River State Park, nodes of <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.