Browse
Search
IPRWG report 061199
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Intergovernmental Parks Work Group
>
Other documents
>
IPRWG report 061199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:01:45 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 3:47:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5/ 26/ 99 <br /> focus for future parks and recreation development could be <br /> targeted to smaller , less - intensive neighborhood parks and larger <br /> district parks . <br /> • By combining active and low - impact recreation needs at the district <br /> park level ( 100 - plus acres ) , it may be possible to develop trails and <br /> retain natural areas on the perimeter while dedicating the interior <br /> to active facilities and " hidden " parking areas . Care must be <br /> exercised to ensure the integrity of natural areas , however . <br /> • Buffers should contain enough land and mature tree canopy to <br /> minimize sound and lighting to an acceptable level . <br /> • Place future programmed active recreation facilities in larger district <br /> parks and make neighborhood parks low - impact . <br /> • Look countywide to define future neighborhood and district parks — <br /> working with UNC , OWASA and other entities . <br /> • Related to the above , land acquisition for parks is needed now to <br /> begin to identify and save priority parklands . Several local <br /> governments ( including some city/ county joint efforts ) are <br /> presently engaged in this ( sometimes called land banking ) . <br /> D . Mechanisms for Implementing Goals Through <br /> Capital Improvement Plans ( CIP ' s ) and Long - <br /> term Parkland Acquisition <br /> To be developed . A meeting of the Managers , elected representatives and <br /> staffs is being scheduled to address these issues . <br /> E . Coordination Opportunities with UNC / <br /> Implications of UNC Expansion <br /> The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill provides both facilities that are <br /> used by the greater town and County populations , and users of local <br /> recreational facilities in the form of students who live on and ( particularly ) <br /> off- campus . <br /> Currently , UNC provides the following recreational facilities for its students . <br /> Policy does not allow use by non - students , although this policy is not strictly <br /> enforced and many Town residents avail themselves of facilities like the <br /> Botanical Gardens , Finley Golf Course , Kenan Stadium , Fetzer Field / Belk <br /> Track , and groups like Rainbow Soccer use fields owned by the University . <br /> In the 1996 report " Recreation and Park Issues in Orange County " , the work <br /> group " determined that in applying standards to the population of Orange <br /> County that 11 , 000 people ( students living in dormitories and <br /> fraternities/ sororities ) could be subtracted from population totals in deriving <br /> park acreage needs . The assumption underlying this adjustment is that these <br /> students reside on campus and have their recreation needs met wholly by <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.