Browse
Search
IPRWG report 061199
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Intergovernmental Parks Work Group
>
Other documents
>
IPRWG report 061199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:01:45 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 3:47:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the public . The inventory of facilities ( including quasi - public and private " fee. <br /> based "" locations ) is included as Appendix C to the report . The inventory would <br /> be maintained for future use , and contains information on the type of activities <br /> available at each location . <br /> The Needs Assessment Committee met during the spring and summer of 1998 to <br /> update recreation and parks needs from each jurisdiction . These needs are found <br /> on pages 4- 7 of the report, and run the gamut from active recreation facilities to <br /> community parks , greenways and `° low- impact " recreation . In summary, the <br /> rima needs identified for each ' urisdiction were . <br /> NeedsJurisdiction Primary <br /> Carrboro Acquire/develop Northern Community Park, <br /> communi ty gymnasium <br /> Chapel Hill Complete Northern Community Park, Southern <br /> Community Park <br /> Hillsborough River Walk Fairview Park Occoneechee Park <br /> Orange County Complete Efland - Cheeks Park, Northern Human <br /> Services Center Park, acquire parkland in <br /> Bingham/ Little River Tw s <br /> An evaluation of previous bonds and projects constructed with those monies is <br /> also provided on pages 7 - 10 of the document . A summary of needs appears on <br /> page 19 . <br /> The Work Group discussed the concept of a Countywide set of standards for <br /> facilities and park design . The development of a common set of standards was <br /> recognized as important, but because of time considerations was deferred by the <br /> Work Group . Recommendation B on page 35 addresses this topic . <br /> 2 . Where Do We Go From Here <br /> With knowledge of needs and facilities ,. the Work Group then turned its attention <br /> to future concerns . One such area was a set of goals and criteria for future land <br /> acquisition and facility sitings . In general , the goals and criteria ( pages 12 - 14 ) <br /> encourage joint siting of schools and parks , preservation of resources in <br /> conjunction with parks development, awareness of environmentally- sensitive <br /> lands , the existence of matching funds , considering the intensity of use , and <br /> locations for linear parks . <br /> The work of the Schools and Land Use Councils was recognized as an important <br /> piece of the recreation picture , and the idea of joint management of school and <br /> park sites ( as well as possible joint acquisition ) is a theme throughout the report . <br /> One topic that the report notes regards impediments to locating new active <br /> recreation facilities . These impediments exist primarily in the context of lighting , <br /> intensity, traffic and noise . In defining both active and low- impact recreation , it is <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.