Browse
Search
IPRWG memo 012401
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Intergovernmental Parks Work Group
>
Other documents
>
IPRWG memo 012401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 3:47:40 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 3:45:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5/ 26/ 99 29 <br /> .niP - a,rrr r r.;•' ,�y�ep� xaa 0 a u <br /> d ..Y. � c ,.ys'6sc^' :R'X"�''�` ,i.,`f". .' y : Y' °s If "I ;.' '4 ,,y � r°�`y '%jxE73 . <br /> y ''' p <br /> v� rr� �E� ....E � CK R0 1. R s ,.± sue i� - � �4 <br /> for R4 A . Development Exactions for Recreation in Orange <br /> County <br /> Population growth over the past thirty years has forced a reassessment of <br /> the traditional means of acquiring public park and recreation areas . <br /> Increasing pressures on funds generated from the traditional property tax <br /> levy and from bond referenda have challenged fundamental ideas on paying <br /> for parks and recreation . Public officials have been encouraged to consider <br /> alternatives to the negotiated purchase of park land and sole reliance on the <br /> property tax base and bond funds . Alternatives to purchase and dedications <br /> include payment - in - lieu and impact fee programs . <br /> The Work Group has recognized that all local government jurisdictions in <br /> Orange County have recreation requirements in their own Subdivision <br /> Regulations or Land Use Ordinances which mandate that land be dedicated , <br /> private recreation facilities provided , or a combination thereof . These <br /> requirements fall under the statutory regulatory/ police authority of local <br /> governments to protect the health , safety , and welfare of their communities . <br /> These recreation requirements are legally acceptable under this authority , <br /> similar to roads , utilities , and other public improvements required as <br /> conditions for subdivision approval . The North Carolina Supreme Court <br /> affirmed this authority in Messer v . Town of Chapel Hill , 297 S . E . 2d 632 <br /> ( 1982 ) , in holding that the Town ordinance , within the statutory powers <br /> given to a city , could exact recreation land or facilities and even require the . <br /> particular site within the subdivision to provide adequate recreation needs . <br /> B . Definition of Payment- in - Lieu and Impact Fee <br /> Programs <br /> 1 ,, Payment- in - Lieu <br /> A more recent tool for providing recreation facilities has been the <br /> inclusion of a payment - in - lieu program under this same general <br /> statutory power . In this program , a subdivision developer pays a fee <br /> related to the jurisdiction 's cost of acquiring commensurate recreation <br /> lands , of the type it could have required the developer to dedicate . <br /> These fees then help provide recreation facilities within the immediate <br /> area of the development . If the developer is provided the option to <br /> meet the jurisdiction 's requirements or make some commensurate <br /> payment - in - lieu of recreation facilities , the jurisdiction is empowered <br /> to accept the payment under its existing statutory powers . Payment - <br /> in - lieu fees must be geographically designated within the " immediate <br /> area of the development , spent within a reasonable amount of time , <br /> and supplemented with other funds . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.