Browse
Search
EDD Task Force agenda 102094
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
EDD Task Force
>
EDD Task Force agenda 102094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 11:41:23 AM
Creation date
2/5/2020 11:39:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> SERVICE & STORAGE <br /> " Screening <br /> SIGNS & LIGHTING <br /> " Signs <br /> " Lighting <br /> Eric Swanson commented that once a performance standard is approved <br /> it allows staff to interpret for a citizen applying for a permit . These <br /> standards are in place so that it will be clear from the beginning what <br /> type of building standards are being encouraged . <br /> Ted Abernathy mentioned that builders are not totally bound by <br /> these standards . Requests for exceptions will go before the Board of <br /> Commissioners on a individual basis . <br /> The placement of antennas was discussed and staff was requested to <br /> reword this section so that they would be allowed if they were screened <br /> and met other requirements , such as height . The definition of outdoor <br /> storage , and the section on signs , will be clarified and discussed at <br /> the next meeting . The entire document will be read for subjective <br /> words , such as attractive , and rewritten where necessary . The <br /> requirement for areas of pedestrian circulation to be impervious surface <br /> will be clarified . The water use limitation will be reviewed and the <br /> unit of measure will be rechecked . Nursing Homes and / or Medical <br /> facilities will be added to the table . <br /> I - 40 / OLD 86 PERMITTED USES : <br /> An updated copy of these uses was distributed ( Attachment # 3 ) . <br /> They will be discussed at the next meeting . <br /> ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITY LIST - DRAFT : <br /> A copy of Slade McCalip ' s memo and list was distributed ( Attachment <br /> # 4 ) . This will be discussed at the next meeting . <br /> Ted Abernathy asked if there were other transportation issues to be <br /> discussed . He mentioned that a transit node within this node has been <br /> discussed as a possibility . <br /> AGENDA ITEMS FOR OCTOBER 20TH MEETING : <br /> " Orange County Transportation Priority List <br /> " I - 40 / OLD 86 Permitted Uses <br /> " Infrastructure South of I - 40 <br /> " Review Performance Standards <br /> " Process <br /> " How to create a seamless / softer portion of the node South of I - 40 <br /> Steve Yuhasz requested that the Rural Buffer be clearly marked on <br /> the map . <br /> Commissioner Insko requested that logical changes for the southern <br /> boundary be discussed on the 20th . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.