Browse
Search
RP Work Group agenda 092195
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Recreation and Parks Work Group
>
RP Work Group agenda 092195
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 10:58:00 AM
Creation date
2/5/2020 10:55:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• All have the provision to accept a cash payment in lieu of providing lands or <br /> facilities within the subdivision . This provides the flexibility to serve needs of the <br /> subject subdivision and the broader community . <br /> • The three jurisdictions can allow for off- site improvements or donations of land to <br /> provide for large , planned park sites contributed to by more than one subdivision . <br /> • All three jurisdictions have flexibility in requiring land, developed facilities , or both . <br /> • Chapel Hill and Orange County regulations are written to be land intensive while <br /> Carrboro basically requires recreation facilities . <br /> • Although the three ordinances use different formulae to define their requirements , <br /> the philosophy and intent of all three ordinances are the same . <br /> • The same ordinance requirements could be considered for all jurisdictions since the <br /> net effect of each " set aside " ordinance provision is to allow new development to <br /> shoulder their impact on existing and Riture recreation and park facilities . <br /> • Carrboro is presently considering a change to their recreation requirements to <br /> become more land intensive due to pressure existing on undeveloped sites in its <br /> planning jurisdiction . Total build-out of Carrboro' s planning jurisdiction is projected <br /> to occur by the year 2010 . <br /> III. Park Classification and Land Area Requirements <br /> • Please refer to Appendix 1 for a full comparison of the adopted park classifications <br /> for each jurisdiction . <br /> • Park types are broken into six types ; Regional, District, Community, Neighborhood, <br /> Mini Park, and Linear Park . <br /> • There are national and state standards for park classification and all three <br /> jurisdictions considered both of these standards in compiling their local standards . <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.