Browse
Search
Minutes 01-21-2020 Business Meeting
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Minutes 01-21-2020 Business Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 10:02:06 AM
Creation date
2/5/2020 9:59:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/21/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> most prominent position, behind the Chief Justice's seat, in the Supreme Court courtroom. Chair <br /> Rich has sent you a recent news story explaining the research and reasoning behind this <br /> concern. <br /> I'm hoping that tonight we can vote to endorse this statement and decide to send it especially to <br /> Judge Fox and to Chief Justice Beasley. <br /> Commissioner Greene read the following: <br /> Last week, Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Carl R. Fox requested the <br /> removal of the portrait of former North Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Ruffin <br /> from the courtroom in the historic Orange County Courthouse "because of his racist past and his <br /> participation in slave trading and slave ownership." The county manager's office has complied <br /> with his request. <br /> A Hillsborough attorney, Orange County farmer, and trustee of the University of North <br /> Carolina at Chapel Hill, Ruffin joined the Supreme Court in 1829, serving as chief justice from <br /> 1833 to 1852. The portrait is a copy of one commissioned by an honor society at UNC. It had <br /> hung in the courtroom since a renovation in 1993. <br /> Ruffin was nationally recognized during his lifetime for his keen judicial mind. Little <br /> mentioned after his death, however, was an opinion in recent years deemed to be among the <br /> most shocking in the entire body of slavery law. State v. Mann (1829), as Judge Fox wrote in a <br /> statement, "rivals the Dred Scott decision in its horror and inhumanity." <br /> State v. Mann gave enslavers virtually unlimited powers of discipline. In overturning a <br /> Chowan County's verdict of assault against a man who had shot a young enslaved African <br /> American woman in the back as she fled from his chastisement, Ruffin wrote: "The power of the <br /> master must be absolute, to render the submission of the slave perfect." There was no legal or <br /> statutory precedent to justify the opinion. Its language was broadly circulated, licensing extreme <br /> physical abuse. <br /> As a businessman, Ruffin trafficked in human lives: he secretly partnered with a South <br /> Carolina man in a speculative slave trading business. His personal life too indicates little respect <br /> for enslaved people: he once took a cane to an enslaved woman who had come on to his <br /> property without permission. <br /> These facts are among those discovered in original research conducted by UNC law <br /> professor Eric Muller and Commissioner Sally Greene.* As a result of their findings, the large <br /> portrait of Judge Ruffin prominently placed in the courtroom of the North Carolina Supreme <br /> Court has come under scrutiny. A committee named by Chief Justice Cheri Beasley is in the <br /> process of considering the appropriate disposition for this and the other portraits in the Court's <br /> collection. Their deliberations are expected to continue through the end of 2020. <br /> As the truth about Ruffin's life and work becomes more widely known, it is increasingly <br /> difficult to justify his portrait in a position of special honor in any courthouse. The Orange County <br /> Board of Commissioners applauds Judge Fox's exemplary leadership in recognizing the silent <br /> but very real impact that the portrait of Ruffin could have on the interests of fair and impartial <br /> justice in Orange County and in taking appropriate action. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.