Orange County NC Website
Approved 2.6.19 <br />SUMMARY NOTES 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 2 JANUARY 2, 2019 3 <br />ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE 4 5 <br />NOTE: A QUORUM IS NOT REQUIRED FOR ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETINGS. 6 7 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Lydia Wegman (Chair), At-Large Chapel Hill Township Representative; Alexander Gregory 8 <br />(Vice-Chair), Chapel Hill Township Representative; Randy Marshall, Bingham Township Representative; Hunter 9 <br />Spitzer, At-Large; Kim Piracci, At-Large; Adam Beeman, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Paul Guthrie, At-10 <br />Large Chapel Hill Township; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township Representative; Carrie Fletcher, Bingham 11 <br />Township Representative; 12 <br /> 13 <br />STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning & Inspections Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; 14 <br />Tina Love, Administrative Assistant III 15 <br /> 16 <br />AGENDA ITEM 1: Call to Order and Roll Call 17 <br />Planning Board Chair Lydia Wegman called the meeting to order. 18 <br /> 19 AGENDA ITEM 2: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS -SIGNS- To review and discuss 20 <br />proposed amendments to the UDO regarding signs 21 <br /> 22 PRESENTER: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 23 <br /> 24 <br />Michael Harvey reviewed the proposed amendments to the UDO and provided background information. Mr. Harvey 25 <br />reviewed pages 4-6 of the abstract packet and guided the board through various changes to the language of the 26 <br />drafted ordinance. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Kim Piracci asked about the wording of 6.12.3 (1) and asked if the wording meant five-feet setback for signs off a 29 <br />road. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Michael Harvey responded, no, the sign setback was five feet of the edge of the right of way. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Kim Piracci asked for clarification. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Michael Harvey explained that with roadways you have a right of way in which a roadway is located. He clarified that 36 <br />Ordinance in Section 6.12.3 (1) requires signs to be a minimum of five feet from the edge of that right of way. It does 37 <br />not matter where the road is, the setback is measured from the edge of the right of way. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Alex Gregory commented so the right of way is larger than the road. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Michael Harvey agreed. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Craig Benedict stated that the road might only be 24 foot of pavement. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Michael Harvey agreed, but stated that if you have a 100-foot right of way, your sign has to be 5 feet from the edge of 46 <br />that right of way. He reminded the board that with public roads that is where your property line technically starts, at 47 <br />the edge of that right of way. 48 <br /> 49 <br />Kim Piracci questioned the legality of signs placed within five feet of a busy corner near her home. 50 <br /> 51 <br />Michael Harvey responded that she was correct in her thinking that the signs are illegally placed, but informed her 52 <br />that he had no legal authority to enforce regulatory standards in public rights of way. He advised that DOT had to 53 <br />remove those signs. The only exception under state law would be political signs. 54