Orange County NC Website
<br /> <br />and promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the overall County. T he OCPB will make every 55 <br />effort to uphold a vision of responsivegovernance and quality public services during our 56 <br />deliberations, decisions, and recommendations.57 <br />58 <br />PUBLIC CHARGE59 <br />The Planning Board pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its 60 <br />citizens to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with 61 <br />fellow citizens. At any time, should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this 62 <br />public charge, the Chair will ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual 63 <br />regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting 64 <br />until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed.65 <br />66 <br />67 <br />AGENDA I TEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS68 <br />69 <br />There were none70 <br />71 <br />72 <br />AGENDA I TEM 7: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO)TEXT AMENDMENT –EROSION CONTROL PERMITS -To 73 <br />make a recommendation to the BOCC on proposed amendments to the UDO pertaining to the lifespan of an erosion 74 <br />control permit. These amendments are scheduled for BOCC public hearing on January 21, 2020.75 <br />76 <br />PRESENTER:Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor77 <br />78 <br />Michael Harvey reviewed the abstract and proposed changes to theUDO. 79 <br />80 <br />Craig Benedict: I’ve asked Michaelis to have the fee structure related to the hours of service, before it wasn’t a 81 <br />direct relation. Now that the projects are done to a certain level and they pick up 20% of the project that is left 82 <br />(Collins Ridge) the amount of the fee and the amount of hours staff m onitors that project will be closely reflected.83 <br />84 <br />Lydia Wegman: Is the fee linked to the amount of land disturbance that occurs?85 <br />86 <br />Craig Benedict: Yes it is.87 <br />88 <br />Michael Harvey: It will be, not yet.89 <br />90 <br />Craig Benedict: This handles one of the matters, permit renewal, there will be another activity which Michael and I 91 <br />are coming to terms with that will probably be in the next few months. It will be about howthe initialfees are 92 <br />calculated. 93 <br />94 <br />Lydia Wegman: So the fee structure is likely to change?95 <br />96 <br />Craig Benedict: Yes.97 <br />98 <br />Michael Harvey continued the review99 <br />100 <br />Michael Harvey: It is hard to ask a homeowner to give us electronic copies when they may not have the wherewithal 101 <br />to do it, it is easy for an engineering firm to give us an electronic copy but not a homeowner. We are trying to provide 102 <br />some level of flexibility and my staff wants to look at physical plans so they can make their note on them. We do 103 <br />scan approved plans so they are always available electronically. We are trying to get to the electronic age. There 104 <br />was at one point, draft text amendments from the Attorney’s Office that wanted to turn this into a totally electronic 105 <br />submittal process. That may come up again. Therewere concerns to the ability of some to submit.106 <br />107 <br />Lydia Wegman: This does require an electronic copy.108 <br /> 7