Agenda - 05-15-2001-9c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

16, 1 3. Ultimate right -of -way along Efland -Cedar Grove Road shall be 70 feet. Dedication along Efland -Cedar 2 Grove Road of five additional feet of right -of way • or 35 feet from center of existing right -of -way, 3 whichever is greater, will be required to be shown on preliminary plan. Property lines to stop at new right - 4, of -way lines. 5 4. Submit draft documentation for Homeowner's Association restrictive covenants or conservation easements 6 that contain use and maintenance provisions for the open space, and buffers. The restrictive covenants or 7 conservation shall designate.a back -up grantee in the event the homeowners association is eliminated. 8 5. No main utility lines shall be located under pavement. 9 6. No private utilities allowed within public right -of- way., 10 7. Recommended taps (water and sewer) to be installed for each lot prior to road construction completion. 11 Encroachment agreement for these services will be required before the State will accept maintenance of the 12 roadway. . 13 8. Provide additional 5' easements on both sides of all streets. Improved intersections to NCDOT standards 14 with 60 feet of right-of-way at all intersections.. - 15 9. No driveways shall be approved within 50 feet of an intersection. 16 10. Provide NCDOT encroachment agreement required for sewer lines prior to acceptance of roads for 17 maintenance. 1S 11. Drainage easements to be. identified at preliminary submittal stage. 19 12. Delineation of FEMA 100 -year floodplain required at preliminary stage. 20 13. In addition to the required 30 -50 foot connecting trail along McGowan Creek, the remaining flood plain. 21 areas shall be set aside to provide a linear riparian corridor which would serve as a riparian buffer, wildlife 22 habitat and possibly a rustic woodland trail to connect to riparian areas on adjacent properties in the future. 23 14. Pursuant to Section IV -B -7 -b of the Subdivision Regulations, dedicate five (5) acres at the extreme 24 northeast corner of site for the purpose of public recreation/open space and reserve an additional eleven -(11) 25 acres of surrounding property for purchase by the County. Should the County be unsuccessful in 26 negotiating a purchase of additional acreage to the north of the site at such time as Preliminary Plat is 27 submitted for review, the County shall accept payment in lieu as an alternative to dedication. 28 15. Required turn lane from Efland -Cedar Grove Road onto Street A (main project entrance) shall be evaluated 29 during Preliminary subdivision review. 30 16. Traffic impact at Efland -Cedar Grove and US 70 intersection to be evaluated during Preliminary subdivision 31 review. 32 • Preliminary Plan addresses all conditions of approval of the concept plan 33 Second Action: Planning Board to consider Preliminary Plan 34 Options: 35 1- Action within two regularly scheduled meetings, or extension thereof; 36 2: If the Planning Board fails to act within the specified time period, application forwarded to BOCC with 37 Planning Board minutes and Planning Staff recommendation and conditions. 38 FISCAL EWPACT: A Fiscal Impact Analysis'is. included as an attachment 39 40 RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends Denial of the Preliminary Plan pursuant to 41 Section III -D ,3-b and IV-B-6-b. 42 43 Benedict said that the staff is recommending denial of this-subdivision on the basis that the applicant has 44 designed the project anticipating a sewer system from Orange County. In the absence of a sewer system from 45 Orange County, the lots would have to be a minimum of 40,000 square feet. The staff thinks that designing a 46 subdivision with the anticipation of water and sewer is premature for two reasons: 1) There is no water and 47 sewer in the area now; and 2) There is no approved and adopted master plan of Efland outside of where the 48 existing sewer system is now. There is a meeting on March 20`h about the Efland sewer plan. 49 50 Allison asked about Richmond Hills in relation to McGowan Creek in terms of tapping on with the Efland sewer 51 system. Benedict said that the Efland system was constructed from 1985 -1988. There were no full residential 52 subdivisions that tied on to that system until Richmond Hills came forward last year. Only individual residential 53 customers have tapped on to the system. He said that Richmond Hills was in the 20 -year transition area adjacent