Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-01-2001-9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 05-01-2001
>
Agenda - 05-01-2001-9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:53:09 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:31:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 05-01-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />suggested is still being considered in the interim. The motion suggested by the Board <br />lessens the time an applicant has to submit a final plat for Planning Department <br />endorsement. Staff will bring Item 3 to public hearing along with proposed wording for <br />item 6 that may need clarification. <br />FOR ACTION <br />• Item 6 is presented in the Ordinance Amending the Orange County Subdivision <br />Regulations that begins on page 14. The proposed ordinance language allows a 60,000 <br />sq. ft. minimum lot size for cluster subdivisions with private roads that provide at least <br />50% open space instead of 80,000 sq. ft. and 33% open space. The 60,000 sq. ft. lot size <br />with 50% open space provides: <br />• benefits to the developer (less cost to build roads and extend utilities or utility <br />easements because the road-length to service .the cluster will be less than for larger <br />lots); and <br />benefits to the County through greater <br />disturbance, and less erosion potential. <br />preservation of open space, less land <br />The chart on page 19 demonstrates the benefits of the 60,000 sq. ft. lot with 50% open space <br />option over other possible outcomes using a sliding scale. <br />(Pages 20 -30 are included for information only. Pages 20-24 describe the method used to <br />develop a sliding scale. Pages 25--30 describe sliding scale options.) <br />This item was discussed with Commissioner Jacobs who was the primary proponent of this <br />provision along with Commissioner Gordon. Chairman Halkiotis directed administration and <br />the Planning Director to work through this Item 6 amendment which as submitted is <br />acceptable as noted in the recommendation. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no immediate financial ~ impact associated with this <br />decision item. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Administration recommends that the Board consider the <br />information and. approve item 6 (the amendment to the Orange County. Subdivision <br />Regulations to allow 60,000 sq. ft, lots on private roads within subdivisions providing at least <br />50% open space), or to direct staff to bring item 6 to the May 29,. 2001, Quarterly Public <br />Hearing along with the amendments specified in item 3. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.