Browse
Search
HPC agenda 102799
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Historic Preservation Commission
>
Agendas
>
1999
>
HPC agenda 102799
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2019 4:50:21 PM
Creation date
12/16/2019 4:44:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U <br /> Postbellum Period - <br /> Much of Orange County ' s lands remained rural in character after the Civil War. <br /> Many Piedmont agriculturists became involved in the developing system of farm tenancy. <br /> This was due in part to post-war labor shortages and cash shortages . Numerous farm <br /> families found themselves involved in the emerging system of either cash or share renting <br /> farmland . Governmental incentives, single- cropping cash crops like tobacco and a labor <br /> shortage led to development of the furnishing system of agriculture . Basically a farm <br /> family worked land for a share of the profits after the sale of the crop, or for a cash rent . <br /> Many families became beholden to local stores, as they would purchase seed , staples, and <br /> fertilizer with credit from the next season' s crop sales . Local furnishing merchants often <br /> ended up carrying the small farmer ' s debt from one year to the next . As a result, many <br /> rural people lost their homes and their possessions. <br /> Another result of these practices was the continued decimation of farmlands. <br /> Tenants would over-farm their lands to plant as much of the cash crop as they could. <br /> Mono -cropping, however, decreased soil fertility and increased erosion, and thus <br /> decreased crop yield . Farmers would purchase fertilizer on credit and thus the cycle of <br /> dependency would continue ( Stine 19890 see also discussion in Mattson 1996 : 3540) . <br /> During the postbellum years the landscape in the St . Mary ' s Corridor can be <br /> partially extrapolated from the Tate Map of 1891 (Figure 4) . The mapmaker appears to <br /> have emphasized the locations of the numerous small churches, schools, and mills, as <br /> well as other natural features such as streams and mountains . Tate only depicts three <br /> mills in the vicinity of the project area. All are on the Eno River and they are Berry ' s j <br /> Mill, Cole ' s Mill , and Cox ' s Mill (Figure 4) . ( See research results section below for <br /> discussion of mills . ) One school is listed in the area, that of Sugar Hill . This building, <br /> however, is found north of the St. Marys Corridor, and west of New Sharon Church <br /> Road, and thus outside the project area (Vanatta, Brinkley and Davidson 1921 : 1918 Soil <br /> Map) . New Sharon Church and Saint Mary ' s Chapel are found on the Tate Map . St . <br /> Mary ' s Chapel is listed as Episcopalian. One shop (Jackson' s Shop) is shown about mid- <br /> way east on St . Mary ' s Road (here called Oxford Highway) . This location would put the <br /> shop east of modern New Sharon Church Road, directly across from S . R. 1595 . The <br /> function of this shop has yet to be ascertained. The fact that only a few homeowners are <br /> listed along St . Mary ' s Road (Turner, Hill , Douglass, Wilson) is interesting . It is clear j <br /> that many more people were living in farms along the project corridor during this time <br /> period (e . g . , Jaeger et*. al. 19969 Mattson 1996) . Tate may only have shown the <br /> farmhouses of people he actually knew, or only mapped those who paid him to do so , or <br /> perhaps only mapped farm owners ' homes, as opposed to those of farm tenants . <br /> The St. Mary ' s corridor would have been dotted by numerous small farmsteads . <br /> These farmsteads could have had frame, log, or occasionally brick structures usually <br /> underpinned by fieldstone piers and/or walls, brick piers , or even wooden block supports <br /> (Henry 1999 ; Mattson 1996) . The typical house style found during the postbellum years <br /> is the vernacular farmhouse form . variants of one story "hall and parlor" and two story "I <br /> house" types (Mattson 199629 - 31 ) . Numerous outbuildings would still have been needed <br /> to house grain, hold stock, and store farming equipment . <br /> 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.