Orange County NC Website
i <br /> t Page 40 <br /> Between January 1 and June 30 , 1998 , the HPO received 115 applications representing 84 <br /> individual projects from owners of non-income-producing historic properties . Fifty-one <br /> projects are located in the Piedmont , 26 in the east and Coastal Plain , and 7 in the west . Wake <br /> County leads the way with twelve projects . Forsyth County is second with eight projects , and <br /> Mecklenburg and Buncombe Counties follow closely with seven projects each . While <br /> Buncombe County is the only county in western North Carolina for which there * are <br /> applications , projects from the eastern and Coastal Plain regions are spread among many <br /> counties with Beaufort , New Hanover, and Chowan the most active thus far . <br /> Of the eighty-four proposed projects , fifty-five of the properties are currently listed as <br /> contributing structures in National Register or Certified Historic Districts , and thirteen are <br /> individually listed in the National Register . The properties for the remaining twelve projects <br /> are not currently listed in the National Register . However , to quality for the credit each must <br /> be formally listed by the Keeper of the National Register by the time the Part B application is <br /> submitted for final certification . Owners are urged to secure National Register listing prior to <br /> beginning a certified rehabilitation , since the National Register process may take six months <br /> to two years or longer . <br /> Thus far the majority of the rehabilitation work consists of repairs to existing historic fabric . <br /> j Typical work includes repairs to the roof, windows , porch structures , exterior and interior <br /> woodwork , plaster walls and ceilings , and wood floors . The state rehabilitation tax credit has <br /> Aso enabled several owners to propose replacing modern vinyl , aluminum , or asbestos siding <br /> with appropriate wood siding . In addition to typical repairs , many projects include <br /> remodeling kitchens and baths , installing new plumbing, mechanical , or electrical systems ; or <br /> constructing compatible rear additions althoughadditions do not qualify for the credit . <br /> Estimated rehabilitation costs for projects are averaging approximately $ 74 , 000 . Total <br /> anticipated rehabilitation expenditures for all projects to date are nearly six million dollars . <br /> Most of the projects submitted have an estimated completion date in 1998 , at which time the <br /> benefits of the new state rehabilitation tax credit for non-income-producing historic buildings <br /> will become even more impressive . =I Robin Stancil Walton <br /> INCREASED TALC CREDIT GENERATES TREMENDOUS GROWTH OF PRESERVATION <br /> PROJECTS <br /> Legislation enacted by the 1997 General Assembly to increase the state rehabilitation tax credit <br /> for income-producing properties from 5 percent to 20 percent has proven to be a catalyst for <br /> historic preservation in North Carolina. The new tax credit provides a 20 percent state tax credit <br /> for the rehabilitation of income-producing historic properties that also qualify for the 20 percent <br /> federal investment and tax credit and are placed in service on or after January 1 , 1998 . In effect <br /> the combined federal- state credits reduce the cost of a certified rehabilitation of an income - <br /> producing historic structure by 40 percent , <br />