Orange County NC Website
y <br /> Today the lay of the land is much the same formerly; no livestock or poultry is <br /> raised, but neat fence rows and a winding farm lane define the pastures and fields . <br /> Some outbuildings have deteriorated, collapsed, or been destroyed, but most remain to <br /> convey a strong sense of agricultural use during the seventy-four year period of <br /> significance . The centerpiece of the farm complex, an extremely well-preserved 1-house <br /> with modest Greek Revival detailing built for Addison Holden in 1873- 74, has local <br /> significance and qualifies for inclusion on the National Register under Criterion C . <br /> Changes to the house during the period of significance were made in a practical, no - <br /> nonsense spirit of improvement. ,Holden enlarged it ca. 1900 by adding a kitchen wing <br /> to the east facade which was remodeled in 1930 after the property was sold to George <br /> Cain Roberts . Roberts also added a north bedroom wing and a south facing porch to <br /> the house ca. 1930 . No other significant additions or alterations were made until the <br /> Anderson ire erni <br /> repad and modzed the house after 1970 . Great care was taken when <br /> a bathroom was created by enclosing a shallow porch on the east facade of the kitchen <br /> wing and a number of appliances were replaced in the kitchen; renovation were made <br /> in the north wing that included replacing board paneling with sheetrock, updating <br /> bathroom fixtures, and a installing a small kitchenette; and one post and decking on the <br /> front porch, and decking on the side porch were replaced . The renovations are <br /> sensitive to the original fabric, and the Holden-Roberts House retains integrity as a fine <br /> vernacular North Carolina farmhouse . <br /> ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXT: <br /> Orange County farmhouses of the Reconstruction Period, like the Holden <br /> Roberts farmhouse, were generally rectangular, two-story, single-pile, gable-roofed <br /> structures with center hall plans now referred to as I-Houses , 2 The house type <br /> originated in English folk culture but its name was coined for builders who brought the <br /> form from Iowa, Indiana, and Illinois, states whose names begin with " I," to Louisiana. 3 <br /> The first I-Houses were simple upward extensions of the one- story hall and parlor plan, <br /> but by the mid nineteenth century, a symmetrical center-hall arrangement was <br /> preferred .4 The proportions and features of these dwellings changed slightly over time, <br /> offering concessions to architectural fashion, and remained a very popular folk-house <br /> type throughout the upland south until the early twentieth century . During the <br /> Reconstruction Period, builders of I-Houses often retained hints of the earlier-popular <br /> Greek Revival style through the use of eaves returns, double-leaf entry doors and <br /> trabeated door and window surrounds, and began to utilize a prominent decorative <br /> front central wall or roof gable . This feature, when combined with the traditional gable <br /> ends, served to create a tri-gable style variant that was increasingly popular in North <br /> Carolina through the early years of the twentieth century . The front gable is thought <br /> to be derived from the Gothic Revival or Downing cottage style that featured steep <br /> central gables and richly ornamented sawn work decoration. The true Gothic Revival <br /> in North Carolina; ornamental gables found on <br /> style, however, was not widely used <br /> vernacular I-Houses <br /> H uses in the state are much shallower and plain or enhanced modestly <br /> . i <br /> 2 Kniffen, Fred, "Folk Housing: Key to Diffusion," Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 55, No. <br /> 4, Dec. 1965, p. 553. <br /> 3 Kniffen, p. 553. <br /> 4 Southern, Michael, "The I-House as a Carrier of Style in Three Counties of the Northeastern Piedmont", in <br /> Swaim, Doug, ed., Carolina Dwelling, North Carolina State University, 1978, p . 72. <br /> 5 Southern, p. 72. <br />