Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
094 <br /> Mr . Belk <br /> March 27 , 1998 ' <br /> Page 2 <br /> recent nominations usually need some updating and expanding . We <br /> have the following suggestions . <br /> All four reports : <br /> It is very important to describe and justify the boundary of <br /> a proposed landmark . Each report needs to be strengthened <br /> in this regard . To each report , add a property map with the <br /> exact boundary of the proposed landmark clearly marked . <br /> Cite the tax map , block , and lot numbers . Add a statement <br /> of the exact acreage . If the boundary is different from the <br /> National Register nomination , explain and justify the <br /> difference . <br /> Many numbered highways and roads have been given proper <br /> names since early National Register nominations were <br /> written . Please give the property ' s current address in <br /> addition to that given on the nomination . <br /> Give the name and mailing address of the current owner . <br /> Chatwood : <br /> The historical name of this property is Faucett Mill and <br /> House , and it is actually listed in the National Register as <br /> a district because of the variety of the resources and the <br /> fact that the mill tract and the house tract comprised two <br /> separate parcels , each having a different owner , at the time <br /> of the nomination in 1988 . It is unclear to us whether both <br /> tracts are intended to be included in the proposed landmark . <br /> If they are still under different ownership , they should be <br /> designated as two separate landmarks . If the two tracts <br /> have now been consolidated under one owner , a single <br /> landmark is appropriate . If only the house tract , and not <br /> the mill tract , is proposed for designation , this should be <br /> stated in the cover memo . Whatever the case , the memo <br /> should address and clarify the matter . <br /> Although the National Register nomination does not include <br /> archaeological resources , they may very well be present . <br /> The mill and surroundings would be of greater concern , but <br /> we are not sure this area is included in the proposed <br /> designation . In any case , mention should be made of the <br /> potential for archaeological resources . <br /> State the current use . <br /> Include current photographs of all the buildings within the <br /> proposed landmark boundaries . - <br />