Browse
Search
Minutes 11-14-2019 Business Meeting
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2019
>
Minutes 11-14-2019 Business Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2019 9:30:36 AM
Creation date
12/10/2019 9:22:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/14/2019
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 1 - Presentation from UNC Student Team
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 2 - Advisory Board on Aging - Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 3 - Agricultural Preservation Board – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 4 - Carrboro Board of Adjustment - Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 5 - Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment - Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 6 - Chapel Hill Planning Commission - Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 7 - Hillsborough Board of Adjustment – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 8 - Hillsborough Planning Board - Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 9 - Human Relations Commission – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 10 - Nursing Home Community Advisory Committee - Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
Agenda 11-14-19 Work Session Item 11 - Workforce Development Board - Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-14-19 Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> <br />Valerie Lucas said the site is helpful, but the organization of it is challenging. <br />Jane Stonehouse said this is a multi-dimensional issue, and it takes a lot of research <br />to understand the terminology being used in the documents. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said this is great work. He referred to the recommendation <br />for an incentive structure, and asked if the students have thought about what this would look <br />like. He said the County has tried some incentives in the past, such as density bonuses, <br />but has been unsuccessful. He said incentives are not big enough to encourage affordable <br />housing close to transportation. He said developers are happy to eschew those incentives <br />to build larger homes. <br />Tara Murray said the students were thinking mostly about the towns, and Chapel Hill <br />may be best able to consider Orange County as a part of its strategy. She said if this type <br />of incentive has not worked in the past, she would consider increasing it, as the need is <br />great. She said the group feels strongly that an incentive would work, if the right size. <br />Commissioner Dorosin referred to the slide that mentioned the 77 cents average <br />additional cost for transportation, and said the land is so much cheaper in the County, and <br />wondered if the number of units could be maximized and residents be given a car, as <br />opposed to building on more expensive land in the towns. He said the piece of the pie <br />where transportation is available is not growing and the cost of incentives would be too <br />high. He asked if there is a tipping point between having affordable housing near public <br />transit, and having it more removed but providing vehicles. He said the same issues arise <br />about have affordable housing near public water and sewer, but the costs become <br />prohibitive. <br />Tara Murray said that is why the group supports the recommendation for on-demand <br />shuttles, but this would be a long time coming and remains in the idea stage. <br />Jane Stonehouse said that Durham County has a new program, and while she is not <br />certain of all that Durham County does, there is a loan program that helps affordable <br />housing developers to compete with the market. She said Orange County may be able to <br />apply the idea of a loan program to get a foot in the door, as affordable housing and <br />transportation is challenging. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said another concern is parking, which is appropriate in an <br />urban setting. He said where public transportation is available; one could reduce the <br />amount of parking to build more units, which could result in a reduction in rent. <br />Commissioner McKee asked if the students looked at the Orange Public Transit <br />(OPT) system and whether it could be reconfigured or revamped to accommodate building <br />away from the urban centers. <br />Tara Murray said the students think that urban transportation is important, but if <br />County transportation was more sustainable, due to lower costs, and the amount of transit <br />available could be increased, it might work; but community inclusiveness becomes a <br />concern. <br />Commissioner McKee said he is also concerned about creating islands of affordable <br />housing. He asked if the students reached into the deeper layers of the community who are <br />most affected, when conducting interviews. <br />Jane Stonehouse said she interviewed Community Empowerment Fund (CEF) <br />members, and the overwhelming consensus is that there is a need for affordable housing, <br />and that most felt stifled by anything that would limit affordable housing in general. <br />Commissioner McKee suggested going further than community activist groups or <br />organizers, and to speak to people at the street level (community centers, churches, etc.). <br />Jane Stonehouse said the people at CEF are on the street level, facing <br />homelessness, and are in current search for affordable housing. <br />Commissioner McKee said he misunderstood what she had said.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.