Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-01-2001-10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 05-01-2001
>
Agenda - 05-01-2001-10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 12:23:32 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:31:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 05-01-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
central portion of the County generally west-southwest of Carrboro revealed higher than normal <br />readings. ,This area conforms generally to an underlying granitic pluton, the likely source of the <br />high radon readings. In all, sixty-seven percent of the radon activities measured in the County <br />exceeded the USEPA proposed maximum contaminant level. However, the. evaluation of radon <br />activity is complicated by the difficulty in measuring the aerated radon gas. While elevated and <br />worthy of note, radon activity in Orange County was lower than that measured in Guilford <br />County three years ago. Additional information on water-borne radon, how to test radon <br />activity, and the potential issues are provided in the attached fact sheaf from the Environmental <br />Health Department. <br />Among the other water quality findings was the incidence of some wells with an elevated level <br />of the naturally-occurring trace metals iron and manganese, which commonly cause staining of <br />plumbing fixtures and other nuisance problems. <br />The Report of the Water Resources Committee attempts to pull together the many findings of <br />the last several years, and assess the implications of the recent USGS report. On pages 18-19 <br />of the report are a list of 10 findings by the Committee, followed by six recommendations <br />offered for further consideration by the Commission for the Environment and the Board of <br />Commissioners. These recommendations include: <br />• The need for further research into the radon results in south-central Orange, perhaps in <br />conjunction with Chatham County. <br />• An ongoing ground water monitoring program to evaluate changes over time in areas seeing <br />new development <br />• Consideration for a comprehensive water budget approach to link surface and ground water <br />planning <br />• Review of sustainable ground water yields and land use policies in some watersheds of the <br />County, based on the available information about ground, water recharge rates <br />• 'A requirement that new subdivisions locate not only septic sites but also well sites prior to <br />subdivision approval <br />• The importance of water conservation for ground ,water based systems - <br />Note: Color v®rsions of maps in the Committee report maybe found in the accompanying USGS published report. <br />The Board of Commissioners' adapted Water Resource Quantity and Quality goal would have <br />the Commission for the Environment assume the mantle of the ground water project, in <br />consultation with the Water Resources Committee. Using the work of the Water Resources <br />Committee, the Commission for the Environment is to evaluate the implications of these <br />findings and report to the Board of Commissioners early next year on suggested policy changes <br />to address these issues. The Board of Health may be interested in examining radon findings. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with receiving these reports. The <br />Environmental Health Division is incumng costs far purchase of radon test kits (air test kits are <br />$5 each and water test kits $10 each). <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board receive the report as <br />information at this time, and schedule the ,items for discussion at a future worksession, before <br />referring the reports to the Board of Health and the Commission for the Environment for further <br />evaluation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.