Browse
Search
2019-875-E AMS - NC State University electric vehicle charger replacement grant
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2010's
>
2019
>
2019-875-E AMS - NC State University electric vehicle charger replacement grant
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2019 10:23:10 AM
Creation date
12/5/2019 9:05:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contract
Date
11/5/2019
Contract Starting Date
11/1/2019
Contract Ending Date
1/31/2022
Contract Document Type
Grant
Agenda Item
11/7/19; 8-e
Amount
$147,247.00
Document Relationships
Agenda 11-07-19 Item 8-e - North Carolina Governor’s Highway Safety Program - Orange County Sheriff’s Office Traffic Safety Project and Approval of Budget Amendment #2-B
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2019\Agenda - 11-07-19 Regular Meeting
R 2019-875 AMS - NC State University electric vehicle charger replacement grant
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\Contract Routing Sheets\Routing Sheets\2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DocuSign Envelope ID:78958EB7-5B02-4CA0-8EAF-F3E892A7B33B <br /> eCFR--Cade of Federal Regulations https://www.ecfrgov/cgi-binitext-idx7SID=74dGb65502c549Bcl Idf... <br /> aqu1pment and property whenever such use Is feasible and redddes pljdct' sts. <br /> (g)The non-Federal entity is encouraged to use value engineering clauses In contracts for construction projects of <br /> sufficient size to offer reasonable opportunitlas for cost reductions.Value englneering is a systematic and creative analysis <br /> of each contract Item or task to ensure that Its essential Function is provided at the overall lower cost. <br /> (h)The non-Federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform <br /> successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement.ConsIderatlon wlII be given to such matters as <br /> contractor integrity,compliance with public policy,record of past performance,and financlal and technical resources.See <br /> also§200.213 Suspension and debarment. <br /> (I)The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficlent to detail the history of procurement.These records will <br /> include,but are not necessarily limited to the following:rationale for the method of procurement,selection of contract type, <br /> contractor selection or rejection,and the basis for the contract price. <br /> 0)(1)The non-Federal entity may use a time and materials type contract only after a determination that no other <br /> contract is suitable and If the contract Includes a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk.Time and <br /> materials type contract means a contract whose cast to a non-Federal entity is the sum of* <br /> (1)The actual cost of materials;and <br /> (ii)Direct labor hours charged at fixed hourly rates that reflect wages,general and administrative expenses,and profit. <br /> (2)Since this formula generates an open-ended contract price,a time-and-materials contract provides no positive <br /> profit incentive to the contractor for cost control or labor efficiency.Therefore,each contract must set a ceiling price that <br /> the contractor exceeds at its own risk.Further,the non-Federal entity awarding such a contract must assert a high degree <br /> of oversight In order to obtain reasonable assurance that the contractor Is using efficient methods and effective cost <br /> controls. <br /> (k)The non-Federal entity alone must be responsible,in accordance with goad administrative practice and sound <br /> business Judgment,for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements.These <br /> Issues Include,but are not limited to,source evaluation,protests,disputes,and claims.These standards do not relieve the <br /> non-Federal ent€ty of any contractual responsibilities under its contracts.The Federal awarding agency will not substitute <br /> its judgment for that of the non-Federal entity unless the matter Is primarily a Federal concern.Violations of law will be <br /> referred to the local,state,or Federal authority having proper Jurisdiction. <br /> 178 FR 78608,Dec.26,2013,as amended at 79 FR 75885,Dec.19.2014;80 FR 43309,,July 22,2015] <br /> §200.319 Competition. <br /> (a)Ail procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with <br /> the standards of this section.In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eIIm€hate unfair earnpetltive <br /> advantage,contractors that develop or draft specifications,requirements,statements of work,or invitations for bids or <br /> requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements.Some of the situations considered to be <br /> restrictive of competition include but are not limited to: <br /> (1)Placing unreasonable requirements on firms In order for them to qualify to do business; <br /> (2)Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding; <br /> (3)Noncompetifive pricing practices between fums or between affiliated companies; <br /> (4)Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts; <br /> (5)Organizatlonat confilcts of Interest; <br /> (6)Specifying only a`brand name"product Instead of allowing"an equal"product to be offered and describing the <br /> performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement;and <br /> (7)Any arbitrary action In the procurement process. <br /> (b)The non-Federal entity must conduct procurements In a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or <br /> administratively Imposed state,local,or tribal geographical preferences In the evaluation of bids or proposals,except In <br /> those cases where applicable Federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference.Nothing In this <br /> section preempts state licensing laws.When contracting for architectural and engineering(ME)services,geographic <br /> location may be a selection criterion provided its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms,given the <br /> 2 of 6 8115/17, I2:16 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.