Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Attachment 1 <br /> inch of rain in 24 hours is exceeded), the clearcutting of site, "the yardstick that is <br /> being used is a yardstick for the 20th century". She asked if there is any interest <br /> in the CFE in trying to do something about this proposed development. She <br /> stated that Craig Benedict, Planning Director, said that someone will go back and <br /> look at the runoff calculations for this development, and maybe the County could <br /> change their rules for how much rain to consider in the runoff calculations. Kim <br /> also lamented the fact that the impact fee has been eliminated in Orange County. <br /> Alan asked what the process would be from here on out for this proposed <br /> development. Matt thought there should be more consideration for the <br /> environmental impact of future developments. Alan asked if there are more <br /> steps that the BOCC must vote on or not? If so, does the CFE want to weigh in <br /> on this? <br /> Bradley then tried to curtail the discussion at 9:00. Jeremy then said the entire <br /> SOE is going to be geared towards advising the BOCC and maybe this should be <br /> added to the report somehow. Kim said that this plan "is the perfect example of <br /> what not to do". Dave stated that the Dillon Rule prevents local governments <br /> from enacting rules that exceed the state requirements on some things. Local <br /> governments now are more restricted than they were in the past. Alan asked if <br /> the BOCC is going to weigh in on this planned development. If it is a major <br /> subdivision it will have to be approved by the BOCC. Bradley tabled further <br /> discussion at 9:08. Dave suggested reviewing the UDO for relevant information <br /> concerning the development process. <br /> IX. Adjournment — Crook motioned to adjourn, and Parry seconded. Meeting <br /> adjourned at 9:10. <br />