Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-17-2001-9g
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 04-17-2001
>
Agenda - 04-17-2001-9g
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:46:53 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/17/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9g
Document Relationships
Minutes - 04-17-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jordan Lake Water Supply Allocation <br />January 2001 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />Haw Would This Allocation Be Used? <br />It is anticipated that the 5 MGD allocation would be used to offset the potential water supply <br />shortfall that may occur if service area demands exceed the 14.3 MGD capacity of the planned <br />improvements to OWASA's raw water conveyance system before the 3 BG Quarry Reservoir <br />can be put into service. OWASA proposes using its Jordan Lake allocation as a temporary <br />supplement to offset that deficit until the expanded Quarry Reservoir can be placed in service in <br />or about 2035. <br />The most feasible means by which OWASA could use this allocation would be through potable <br />water interconnections with the City of Durham and/or Chatham County. Rather than pumping <br />raw water through a lengthy pipeline from Jordan Lake to OWASA's treatment plant in <br />Carrboro, or pumping treated water from a new plant on the western side of Jordan Lake in <br />Chatham County through a new transmission line to OWASA's service area, it appears to be <br />more feasible to obtain treated water directly through the Durham or Chatham County system. <br />This assumes, of course, that Durham su~ecessfully obtains its own Jordan Lake allacation and <br />develops the necessary withdrawal, treatment, and transmission facilities to use that allocation. <br />According to Durham staff, this scenario might evolve solely through Durham's own efforts or <br />through an interlocal or regional partnership. <br />The other assumption inherent to this scenario is that OWASA would be party to a satisfactory <br />long term agreement with Durham and/or Chatham County that guaranteed to OWASA the <br />fixture availability of specified amounts of treated water. <br />What About OWASA's Existin Investments in Jordan Lake? <br />OWASA owns a 125-acre parcel in Chatham County adjacent to Corps of Engineers property on <br />the west bank of Jordan Lake south of U.S. Highway 64. This land cost $550,000 in the early <br />1990s. Additionally, OWASA has paid a total. of $148,933 in annual fees for its existing 10 <br />MGD allocation. Current payments are between $19,000 snd $20,000 per year. Other Jordan <br />Lake expenditures have included approximately $60,000 in construction costs for pipe casings <br />placed under U.S. Highway 64 several years ago and approximately $25,000 for an intake siting <br />study conducted in 1992. <br />It is expected that some of these assets, especially the land and the intake siting analysis, would <br />be useful in negotiating appropriate water supply agreements with Durham and/or Chatham <br />County. Durham staff have indicated. interest in using OWASA's Jordan Lake property for a <br />water treatment plant, but have not evaluated this extensively. OWASA would be entitled to a <br />pro-rated reimbursement of previous allocation payments made to the State if the EMC adjusts <br />the present 10 MGD allocation downward. <br />14 <br />Except for the pipe casement under Highway 64, it appears that the full value of OWASA's <br />Jordan Lake assets could be recovered or reinvested. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.