Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-17-2001-9f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 04-17-2001
>
Agenda - 04-17-2001-9f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:47:39 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:31:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/17/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 04-17-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
RES-2001-045 Resolution approving an Ordinance for a Zoning Atlas Amendment - Hillsborough Area Economic Development District Atlas Amendments
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~,~,~ <br />~„~ <br />T <br />I design manual addresses the mixture of uses and compatible public facilities. He said that there '~ <br />2 should be a generalized overview in the manual of the capacity concept for the transportation network ~~ <br />3 in the area, Affordable housing will also be addressed in the generalized overview. ~ <br />a Commissioner Jacobs said that the issue has been raised about limiting the size of <br />5 big-box retail to control the overall traffic impacts. Craig Benedict said that when discussing this topic <br />6 in the EDD Task Farce, it was the general consensus that this is something that the County needs to <br />7 be sensitive about so as not to hurt the downtown area of Hillsborough. <br />8 Commissioner Jacobs said that same of the uses indicate that there will be no drive- <br />9 through facilities in the Hillsborough EDD. Craig Benedict said that the intent was to not have drive- <br />to through facilities. , <br />t t Commissioner Jacobs made reference to page 67 and the linear office district. He <br />t2 made several notations, which Craig Benedict will take into consideration in editing the manual. The <br />t3 issues included vehicular connectivity, open space connectivity, and setbacks and buffers. <br />t4 Commissioner Gordon will write down additional comments and submit them to Craig <br />is Benedict before the Planning Board meeting in April. <br />16 <br />17 .MOTION; A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to <br />is refer the Comprehensive Plan Text and Map Amendments (items C, 1-3) to the Planning Board for a <br />19 recommendation to be returned to the Orange County_,Board of County Commissioners for <br />zo consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the Board of Commissioners April 17, 2001 <br />2t meeting. <br />z2 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />23 <br />24 4. PUBLIC SCHOOL IMPACT FEE <br />25 The County Commissioners heard a report from the consultant, Mr. Paul Tischler, on the <br />26 calculation of maximum permissible public school impact fees that consider differentiated fees based <br />27 on housing type. After the report, public comment was received on the amount of the impact, fee and <br />28 an thin related thereto. At the conclusion of the public comment period, the County Commissioners <br />Z9 considered referring the report to the administration for a recommendation on whether the impact <br />3o fees should be changed or not, and if so, to what amounts. That recommendation is to come back to <br />31 the Board as the Board decides in the context of the Board's deliberation leading to the adoption of <br />3z the July 1, 2001 budget. <br />33 Planning Director Craig Benedict made introductory remarks. He said that the public <br />34 school impact fee for Orange County is unique. In 1987, the North Carolina legislature gave Orange <br />3S County the opportunity to assess impact fees. Impact fees are used to receive additional revenue to <br />36 help offset'the capital costs of certain types of facilities. In 1993 the first Impact Fee was enacted in <br />37 Orange County. This fee was set at $750.00 far both school systems. Over the last few years, <br />38 Chapel Hill-Carrbora City School District has increased the impact fee for their district from .$750 to <br />39 $1,500 to $3,000. This is a regular analysis that the County is doing. As part of this mechanism to <br />ao reevaluate the student generation rate and the casts of providing schools, the County also wanted to <br />~ t look at the amount of students that were being generated and added to the two school systems. The <br />42 two school systems are being evaluated independently because there are different growth rates. <br />43 Overall, there has been a lot of work during the last three years to determine the level of. service <br />Ott standards. The County chase to hire a consultant, Paul Tischler and Associates, to conduct the <br />4S school impact fee study. <br />a6 <br />47 Questions from the Oran a Coun Commissioners and members of the Plannin Board <br />~8 In answer to a question from Commissioner Gordon, Craig Benedict said that if there were <br />~9 not an impact fee the property tax rate for existing properties would likely be higher. In brief, the <br />5o impact fee is having new growth pay far school capital needs associated with that growth. Also, <br />st impact fee's are not used for,renovations of existing schools. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.