Browse
Search
Planning Board minutes 080719
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
Planning Board minutes 080719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2019 10:51:47 AM
Creation date
11/4/2019 10:51:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/7/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED 9/4/19 <br /> <br />Adam Beeman: Okay. 166 <br /> 167 <br />Carolyn Poteat: My name is Carolyn Swepson Poteat. We received a letter from the planning board stating that we 168 <br />needed to come to the meeting tonight in reference to Clarence Doby rezoning. What do we need to do? 169 <br /> 170 <br />David Blankfard: The piece of property is zoned in two different ways, and so the County commissioners have 171 <br />tasked us to clean up so that the zoning is uniform for the entire piece of property. You would just need to listen to 172 <br />the possibility of being rezoned as a commercial site. There is not really anything that you need to say or do. 173 <br /> 174 <br />Carrie Fletcher: I am a homeowner in Orange County as well. I am always concerned about development around 175 <br />my home. What can be done for the citizens on the list nearby that will be impacted in order to keep them informed 176 <br />to quell their fears and make the transition less painful? Is there anything that can be addressed to the 177 <br />neighborhoods and people around so they know what's going on? 178 <br /> 179 <br />Chad Huffine: Yes. As part of the process with planning and the commissioners, a dimension or radius around the 180 <br />property including adjacent properties, would be notified by mail, newspaper, and by signage. The property owners 181 <br />can be located in the packet. They have been made aware as the commissioners meeting approaches in 182 <br />September. 183 <br /> 184 <br />Carrie Fletcher: Can the folks in the back hear? I want to make sure they can understand. 185 <br /> 186 <br />Chad Huffine: They will be notified by the County prior to the public hearings. They will have another opportunity to 187 <br />speak to the County commissioners at that time but also to hear about any developments of what is proposed. 188 <br /> 189 <br />Bal K Sharma: It sounds like some of the neighbors need to be educated about the good and the bad of this 190 <br />proposal. I said commercial is good for several reasons, but at the same time, homeowners are outraged and they 191 <br />need to be convinced why it is good for them. If everyone understands why it is good it will be a win-win for 192 <br />everyone. Everyone needs to be educated on why it is important to the people and how it will also impact everyone. 193 <br /> 194 <br />Patrick Mallett: In North Carolina, most of the process is prescribed by state law on what you have to do. This type 195 <br />of zoning process has to go to a planning board and it needs to make a recommendation. It then goes to an elected 196 <br />body. With most jurisdictions in North Carolina, the notification requirements are far less than what we actually do. 197 <br />Notices were sent out to every property owner that was on the tax rolls and owns property within a thousand feet. 198 <br />We run legal ads, we post signs for both the planning board meeting and the board of commissioners meeting. We 199 <br />also post all the information online so people can come and check our rezoning cases or what's new on the planning 200 <br />portion of our website. If you have a question about this case or anything going on in the area, my door is always 201 <br />open and you can contact me. 202 <br /> 203 <br />Adam Beeman: You said that the area has been intended to be commercial for some time. Do you have a date on 204 <br />when that was set in stone for Orange County? 205 <br /> 206 <br />Craig Benedict: Good evening. Craig Benedict, Orange County Planning Director. This area was originally 207 <br />designated in 1981 when zoning went into effect in this Township as Commercial Industrial Activity Node. They left 208 <br />the existing zoning in place as (R-1) residential. You have also heard some of our discussions in the past about 209 <br />leaving it for somebody to ask for a conversion consistent with the Commercial Industrial Activity Node if they wanted 210 <br />to come in in the future. In 1994, the (CITAN) Commercial Industrial Activity Node was changed in land-use to 211 <br />economic development while at the same time, they changed the zoning with the land-use, so the zoning is in place 212 <br />just across Buckhorn Road. There are two different ways to do it. You will also notice that in these CITANs, the 213 <br />commissioners have asked us if there are places that we are calling pre-zoned to fix to an area that’s consistent with 214 <br />that future land-use. In this case, the applicant was out in front of us. You may see some other conversions that are 215 <br />even government initiated. The commissioners also noticed that in the 1990's there was housing in the area and 216 <br />leaving the (R-1) designation on there allowed those houses to remain as a conforming use, so this was a way to 217 <br />balance the program. This is in transition and may transition to more commercial industrial in the near future. By 218 <br />2008, when the comprehensive plan was updated, we had additional outreach meetings to discuss the economic 219 <br />development land-use and commercial industrial land use. The last opportunity was roughly in 2013 when we started 220
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.