Browse
Search
BOH agenda 082819
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Agendas
>
2019
>
BOH agenda 082819
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2019 8:50:11 AM
Creation date
11/4/2019 8:49:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/28/2019
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
How healthy, wealthy is Alamance County? Here are the numbers. - News - The Times-News - Burlington, NC <br />https://www.thetimesnews.com/news/20190721/how-healthy-wealthy-is-alamance-county-here-are-numbers[8/19/2019 10:57:33 AM] <br />Isaac Groves Times-News @TNIGroves <br />How healthy, wealthy is Alamance County? Here are the numbers. <br />Jul 21, 2019 at 10:00 AM <br />The 2018 Alamance County Community Assessment paints a picture of a growing county with economic challenges and disparities among racial groups <br />contributing to health problems and a need to focus on education, access to healthcare, exercise, good food and poverty. <br />The Alamance County Health Department, Impact Alamance, Healthy Alamance, Alamance Regional Medical Center and Cone Health and the United Way <br />of Alamance County collected data for the report, which is done every four years. It’s available at Alamance-nc.com/health. <br />The county’s population is older than the state as a whole. Statewide and locally, 45- to 54-year-olds make up the largest age group, but the county’s <br />percentage of the middle-aged, at 13.5 percent, is nearly a third of a percentage point higher than the state’s, according to the CHA. While statewide 25- to <br />44-year-olds — at more than 25 percent of the population — make up a larger proportion of the population than in Alamance County, which is less than 24 <br />percent. <br />Other demographics: <br />57 percent of the county is occupied by single-family homes on five acres or less with heavy growth in the Southeast. <br />39 percent is agriculture. <br />Population: 162,000, a nearly 7-percent increase since 2010. <br />68 percent white. <br />19 percent black. <br />13 percent Latino. <br />2 percent Asian. <br />Less than 1 percent American Indian. <br />43,554 families, a 9-percent increase over 2010. <br />64,205 households. <br />Economics <br />Largest employment sectors as of 2016: <br />21 percent of Alamance County workers are in education, government or non-profits; <br />20 percent manufacturing; <br />17 percent retail and services; <br />17 percent medical and healthcare; and <br />13 percent leisure and hospitality. <br /> More about our incomes: <br />$42,463 median income, more than $9,000 less than the state median. <br />$57,308 — the “self-sufficiency standard,” which is the minimum estimated income to realistically support a family of four in Alamance County without <br />public assistance. <br />118 families per average week get help at Allied Churches of Alamance County. <br />28 percent of children lived in poverty from 2012 to 2016, about 4 percent more than the state’s child poverty rate. <br />53 percent of students eligible for free-or-reduced school lunches. <br />59 percent of households with children receive food stamps, compared to the state rate of 54 percent. <br />Poverty is concentrated in the northeast part of the county where 17 to 29 percent of families with children live below the poverty line, though the <br />area along the Orange County line is much better off with 3 percent or less living below the poverty level. Southeast Alamance also has a high <br />poverty rate, at 12 to 17 percent, while northeast Alamance near the Guilford County line is fairly affluent. <br />13.8 percent of families living below the poverty level in 2016 was a lot higher than the 11.7 percent in 2011, but also a decline from the 2011 to 2015 peak <br />of 14.4 percent. It’s also higher than the state’s 12.4 percent rate. <br />27.8 percent of local children live below the poverty level, putting it among the higher rates in the state compared to the state level of 23.9 percent. <br />12,007 families, or 25,055 individuals, got assistance through SNAP (food stamps) in 2017. <br />24 percent of recipients were working. <br />Health <br />The 2017 infant mortality rate was 5.2 deaths per 1,000 live births younger than 1 year old — a big drop from 8.7 in 2003. The statewide infant mortality <br />rate was 7.1 deaths per 1,000 births.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.